mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Plant in Cupboard, Orange on Rably, Inat Aphone. Benchmarking Incremental Learning of Situation and Language Model using a Text-Simulated Situated Environment

arXiv 2502.11733 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) serve not only as chatbots but as key components in agent systems, where their common-sense knowledge significantly impacts performance as language-based planners for situated or embodied action. We assess LLMs' incremental learning (based on feedback from the environment), and controlled in-context learning abilities using a text-based environment. We introduce challenging yet interesting set of experiments to test i) how agents can incrementally solve tasks related to every day objects in typical rooms in a house where each of them are discovered by interacting within the environment, ii) controlled in-context learning abilities and efficiency of agents by providing short info about locations of objects and rooms to check how faster the task can be solved, and finally iii) using synthetic pseudo-English words to gauge how well LLMs are at inferring meaning of unknown words from environmental feedback. Results show that larger commercial models have a substantial gap in performance compared to open-weight but almost all models struggle with the synthetic words experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

21 of 33 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  5. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  6. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  7. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
  8. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
  9. 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
  10. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 339
  11. 2018TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Gamescited by 310
  12. 2019Interactive Fiction Games: A Colossal Adventurecited by 168
9 more
  1. 2024BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Gamescited by 146
  2. 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
  3. 2024LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBenchcited by 94
  4. 2023Clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate Chat-Optimized Language Models as Conversational Agentscited by 54
  5. 2024Why Larger Language Models Do In-context Learning Differently?cited by 45
  6. 2024AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agentscited by 28
  7. 2021A Systematic Survey of Text Worlds as Embodied Natural Language Environmentscited by 17
  8. 2022WinoDict: Probing language models for in-context word acquisitioncited by 15
  9. 2023What A Situated Language-Using Agent Must be Able to Do: A Top-Down Analysiscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.