mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarially Robust CLIP Models Can Induce Better (Robust) Perceptual Metrics

arXiv 2502.11725 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Measuring perceptual similarity is a key tool in computer vision. In recent years perceptual metrics based on features extracted from neural networks with large and diverse training sets, e.g. CLIP, have become popular. At the same time, the metrics extracted from features of neural networks are not adversarially robust. In this paper we show that adversarially robust CLIP models, called R-CLIP_textrmF, obtained by unsupervised adversarial fine-tuning induce a better and adversarially robust perceptual metric that outperforms existing metrics in a zero-shot setting, and further matches the performance of state-of-the-art metrics while being robust after fine-tuning. Moreover, our perceptual metric achieves strong performance on related tasks such as robust image-to-image retrieval, which becomes especially relevant when applied to "Not Safe for Work" (NSFW) content detection and dataset filtering. While standard perceptual metrics can be easily attacked by a small perturbation completely degrading NSFW detection, our robust perceptual metric maintains high accuracy under an attack while having similar performance for unperturbed images. Finally, perceptual metrics induced by robust CLIP models have higher interpretability: feature inversion can show which images are considered similar, while text inversion can find what images are associated to a given prompt. This also allows us to visualize the very rich visual concepts learned by a CLIP model, including memorized persons, paintings and complex queries.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

47 of 54 references.

References · 47

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  6. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  7. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  8. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  9. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  10. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  11. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  12. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
35 more
  1. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  2. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  3. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  4. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  5. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 811
  6. 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
  7. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
  8. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  9. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 561
  10. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  11. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 403
  12. 2020Differentiable Augmentation for Data-Efficient GAN Trainingcited by 363
  13. 2023DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Datacited by 337
  14. 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 327
  15. 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 191
  16. 2018PieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment through Pairwise Preferencecited by 160
  17. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 145
  18. 2024Robust CLIP: Unsupervised Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Vision Embeddings for Robust Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 120
  19. 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Modelscited by 117
  20. 2019Functional Adversarial Attackscited by 82
  21. 2023Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Modelscited by 79
  22. 2019Interpreting Adversarially Trained Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 75
  23. 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
  24. 2023A Unified Algebraic Perspective on Lipschitz Neural Networkscited by 60
  25. 2019E-LPIPS: Robust Perceptual Image Similarity via Random Transformation Ensemblescited by 45
  26. 2022Shift-tolerant Perceptual Similarity Metriccited by 44
  27. 2022Sparse Visual Counterfactual Explanations in Image Spacecited by 30
  28. 2023R-LPIPS: An Adversarially Robust Perceptual Similarity Metriccited by 28
  29. 2023LipSim: A Provably Robust Perceptual Similarity Metriccited by 15
  30. 2024What do we learn from inverting CLIP models?cited by 13
  31. 2023CLIPAG: Towards Generator-Free Text-to-Image Generationcited by 12
  32. 2024Ensemble everything everywhere: Multi-scale aggregation for adversarial robustnesscited by 12
  33. 2023Attacking Perceptual Similarity Metricscited by 10
  34. 2022Identifying and Mitigating Flaws of Deep Perceptual Similarity Metricscited by 4
  35. 2022ARIA: Adversarially Robust Image Attribution for Content Provenancecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 2.

10 papers.