mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ensemble everything everywhere: Multi-scale aggregation for adversarial robustness

arXiv 2408.05446 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial examples pose a significant challenge to the robustness, reliability and alignment of deep neural networks. We propose a novel, easy-to-use approach to achieving high-quality representations that lead to adversarial robustness through the use of multi-resolution input representations and dynamic self-ensembling of intermediate layer predictions. We demonstrate that intermediate layer predictions exhibit inherent robustness to adversarial attacks crafted to fool the full classifier, and propose a robust aggregation mechanism based on Vickrey auction that we call textitCrossMax to dynamically ensemble them. By combining multi-resolution inputs and robust ensembling, we achieve significant adversarial robustness on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets without any adversarial training or extra data, reaching an adversarial accuracy of ≈72% (CIFAR-10) and ≈48% (CIFAR-100) on the RobustBench AutoAttack suite (L_∞=8/255) with a finetuned ImageNet-pretrained ResNet152. This represents a result comparable with the top three models on CIFAR-10 and a +5 % gain compared to the best current dedicated approach on CIFAR-100. Adding simple adversarial training on top, we get ≈78% on CIFAR-10 and ≈51% on CIFAR-100, improving SOTA by 5 % and 9 % respectively and seeing greater gains on the harder dataset. We validate our approach through extensive experiments and provide insights into the interplay between adversarial robustness, and the hierarchical nature of deep representations. We show that simple gradient-based attacks against our model lead to human-interpretable images of the target classes as well as interpretable image changes. As a byproduct, using our multi-resolution prior, we turn pre-trained classifiers and CLIP models into controllable image generators and develop successful transferable attacks on large vision language models.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2024.

Builds on

28 of 52 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  7. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  8. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  9. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  10. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  11. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  12. 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
16 more
  1. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  2. 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 234
  3. 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 210
  4. 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 187
  5. 2020Training independent subnetworks for robust predictioncited by 177
  6. 2022The Slingshot Mechanism: An Empirical Study of Adaptive Optimizers and the Grokking Phenomenoncited by 94
  7. 2018Adversarial Examples that Fool both Computer Vision and Time-Limited Humanscited by 73
  8. 2023Decoupled Kullback-Leibler Divergence Losscited by 58
  9. 2020Robust Out-of-distribution Detection for Neural Networkscited by 57
  10. 2023Robust Principles: Architectural Design Principles for Adversarially Robust CNNscited by 46
  11. 2021Drawing Multiple Augmentation Samples Per Image During Training Efficiently Decreases Test Errorcited by 33
  12. 2024Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Modelscited by 30
  13. 2023Scaling Laws for Adversarial Attacks on Language Model Activationscited by 19
  14. 2022Adversarial vulnerability of powerful near out-of-distribution detectioncited by 16
  15. 2021Should Ensemble Members Be Calibrated?cited by 11
  16. 2022What does a deep neural network confidently perceive? The effective dimension of high certainty class manifolds and their low confidence boundariescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 8; 2026: 2.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Rethinking Model Ensemble in Transfer-based Adversarial Attacks
  2. 2024Explaining the role of Intrinsic Dimensionality in Adversarial Training
  3. 2025Robust Experts: the Effect of Adversarial Training on CNNs with Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Layers
  4. 2023Provable Robustness Against a Union of ℓ0 Adversarial Attacks
  5. 2022On the Adversarial Robustness of Mixture of Experts
  6. 2023Improving the Robustness of Quantized Deep Neural Networks to White-Box Attacks using Stochastic Quantization and Information-Theoretic Ensemble Training
  7. 2024Distilling Adversarial Robustness Using Heterogeneous Teachers
  8. 2022Towards Alternative Techniques for Improving Adversarial Robustness: Analysis of Adversarial Training at a Spectrum of Perturbations