Identifying and Mitigating Flaws of Deep Perceptual Similarity Metrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Measuring the similarity of images is a fundamental problem to computer vision for which no universal solution exists. While simple metrics such as the pixel-wise L2-norm have been shown to have significant flaws, they remain popular. One group of recent state-of-the-art metrics that mitigates some of those flaws are Deep Perceptual Similarity (DPS) metrics, where the similarity is evaluated as the distance in the deep features of neural networks. However, DPS metrics themselves have been less thoroughly examined for their benefits and, especially, their flaws. This work investigates the most common DPS metric, where deep features are compared by spatial position, along with metrics comparing the averaged and sorted deep features. The metrics are analyzed in-depth to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the metrics by using images designed specifically to challenge them. This work contributes with new insights into the flaws of DPS, and further suggests improvements to the metrics. An implementation of this work is available online: https://github.com/guspih/deep_perceptual_similarity_analysis/
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2022.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2014Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 1,218
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2015Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metriccited by 407
- 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
- 2017Beyond the Pixel-Wise Loss for Topology-Aware Delineationcited by 82
- 2017Perceptual Generative Adversarial Networks for Small Object Detectioncited by 76
- 2019E-LPIPS: Robust Perceptual Image Similarity via Random Transformation Ensemblescited by 44
4 more
- 2022Do better ImageNet classifiers assess perceptual similarity better?cited by 34
- 2018Generative Adversarial Networks and Perceptual Losses for Video Super-Resolutioncited by 30
- 2020An Unsupervised Information-Theoretic Perceptual Quality Metriccited by 28
- 2020Pretraining Image Encoders without Reconstruction via Feature Prediction Losscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023LipSim: A Provably Robust Perceptual Similarity Metriccited by 15
- 2025Adversarially Robust CLIP Models Can Induce Better (Robust) Perceptual Metricscited by 10
- 2026Counterfactual Explanations on Robust Perceptual Geodesicscited by 2
- 2023Deep Perceptual Similarity is Adaptable to Ambiguous Contextscited by 0
- 2026Counterfactual Explanations on Robust Perceptual Geodesics26 Jan 2026
- 2025Adversarially Robust CLIP Models Can Induce Better (Robust) Perceptual Metrics17 Feb 2025
- 2023LipSim: A Provably Robust Perceptual Similarity Metric27 Oct 2023
- 2023Deep Perceptual Similarity is Adaptable to Ambiguous Contexts5 Apr 2023