mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Safe and Optimal Control of Autonomous Systems

arXiv 2502.11057 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.SYcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As autonomous systems become more ubiquitous in daily life, ensuring high performance with guaranteed safety is crucial. However, safety and performance could be competing objectives, which makes their co-optimization difficult. Learning-based methods, such as Constrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL), achieve strong performance but lack formal safety guarantees due to safety being enforced as soft constraints, limiting their use in safety-critical settings. Conversely, formal methods such as Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) Reachability Analysis and Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) provide rigorous safety assurances but often neglect performance, resulting in overly conservative controllers. To bridge this gap, we formulate the co-optimization of safety and performance as a state-constrained optimal control problem, where performance objectives are encoded via a cost function and safety requirements are imposed as state constraints. We demonstrate that the resultant value function satisfies a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, which we approximate efficiently using a novel physics-informed machine learning framework. In addition, we introduce a conformal prediction-based verification strategy to quantify the learning errors, recovering a high-confidence safety value function, along with a probabilistic error bound on performance degradation. Through several case studies, we demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework in enabling scalable learning of safe and performant controllers for complex, high-dimensional autonomous systems.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2025.

Builds on

22 of 40 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  3. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  4. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  5. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
  6. 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 287
  7. 2021Safe Nonlinear Control Using Robust Neural Lyapunov-Barrier Functionscited by 94
  8. 2020DeepReach: A Deep Learning Approach to High-Dimensional Reachabilitycited by 91
  9. 2017Information Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Drivingcited by 90
  10. 2023The Safety Filter: A Unified View of Safety-Critical Control in Autonomous Systemscited by 88
  11. 2016Algorithms for Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionality for Certain Hamilton-Jacobi Equations Arising in Control Theory and Elsewherecited by 24
  12. 2023Solving Stabilize-Avoid Optimal Control via Epigraph Form and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
10 more
  1. 2023Verification of Neural Reachable Tubes via Scenario Optimization and Conformal Predictioncited by 23
  2. 2024Solving Minimum-Cost Reach Avoid using Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  3. 2023On Safety and Liveness Filtering Using Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability Analysiscited by 11
  4. 2024Learning a Formally Verified Control Barrier Function in Stochastic Environmentcited by 11
  5. 2024Exact Imposition of Safety Boundary Conditions in Neural Reachable Tubescited by 7
  6. 2024Semi-Supervised Safe Visuomotor Policy Synthesis using Barrier Certificatescited by 7
  7. 2019Safe Approximate Dynamic Programming Via Kernelized Lipschitz Estimationcited by 4
  8. 2023Multi-Agent Path Integral Control for Interaction-Aware Motion Planning in Urban Canalscited by 3
  9. 2024Cooptimizing Safety and Performance with a Control-Constrained Formulationcited by 3
  10. 2023Collision Cone Control Barrier Functions: Experimental Validation on UGVs for Kinematic Obstacle Avoidancecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 4.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Statistically Assuring Safety of Control Systems using Ensembles of Safety Filters and Conformal Prediction
  2. 2025Learning State-Action Control Barrier Functions for Model-Free Control under Constraints
  3. 2026CAPSULE: Control-Theoretic Action Perturbations for Safe Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Safety-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Post-Training Reachability Verification for Robot Navigation
  5. 2025Safe and Near-Optimal Control with Online Dynamics Learning
  6. 2026Safe Reinforcement Learning using Ideas from Model Predictive Control
  7. 2025Safe model-based Reinforcement Learning via Model Predictive Control and Control Barrier Functions
  8. 2026Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Emergency Collision Avoidance