mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging Constraint Violation Signals For Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2502.10431 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL

Abstract (arXiv)

In many RL applications, ensuring an agent's actions adhere to constraints is crucial for safety. Most previous methods in Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning (ACRL) employ a projection layer after the policy network to correct the action. However projection-based methods suffer from issues like the zero gradient problem and higher runtime due to the usage of optimization solvers. Recently methods were proposed to train generative models to learn a differentiable mapping between latent variables and feasible actions to address this issue. However, generative models require training using samples from the constrained action space, which itself is challenging. To address such limitations, first, we define a target distribution for feasible actions based on constraint violation signals, and train normalizing flows by minimizing the KL divergence between an approximated distribution over feasible actions and the target. This eliminates the need to generate feasible action samples, greatly simplifying the flow model learning. Second, we integrate the learned flow model with existing deep RL methods, which restrict it to exploring only the feasible action space. Third, we extend our approach beyond ACRL to handle state-wise constraints by learning the constraint violation signal from the environment. Empirically, our approach has significantly fewer constraint violations while achieving similar or better quality in several control tasks than previous best methods.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2025.

Builds on

21 of 26 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  4. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  5. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  6. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  7. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
  8. 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 599
  9. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 247
  10. 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 175
  11. 2020SurVAE Flows: Surjections to Bridge the Gap between VAEs and Flowscited by 71
  12. 2017OptLayer - Practical Constrained Optimization for Deep Reinforcement Learning in the Real Worldcited by 70
9 more
  1. 2023State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 55
  2. 2019Leveraging exploration in off-policy algorithms via normalizing flowscited by 46
  3. 2020Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
  4. 2019Improving Exploration in Soft-Actor-Critic with Normalizing Flows Policiescited by 38
  5. 2018Resource Constrained Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
  6. 2021Escaping from Zero Gradient: Revisiting Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Frank-Wolfe Policy Optimizationcited by 18
  7. 2024FlowPG: Action-constrained Policy Gradient with Normalizing Flowscited by 16
  8. 2023Benchmarking Actor-Critic Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Robotics Control with Action Constraintscited by 11
  9. 2023Generative Modelling of Stochastic Actions with Arbitrary Constraints in Reinforcement Learningcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Action Mapping for Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Environments with Constraints
  2. 2025Efficient Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Acceptance-Rejection Method and Augmented MDPs
  3. 2025Flow-Based Policy for Online Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2025Constraint-Aware Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Action Scaling
  5. 2024Constrained Reinforcement Learning Under Model Mismatch
  6. 2026Aligning Flow Map Policies with Optimal Q-Guidance
  7. 2024Towards Interpretable Reinforcement Learning with Constrained Normalizing Flow Policies
  8. 2022Let Offline RL Flow: Training Conservative Agents in the Latent Space of Normalizing Flows