mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the existence of EFX allocations in multigraphs

arXiv 2502.09777 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2025cs.GT cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of "fairly" dividing indivisible goods to several agents that have valuation set functions over the sets of goods. As fair we consider the allocations that are envy-free up to any good (EFX), i.e., no agent envies any proper subset of the goods given to any other agent. The existence or not of EFX allocations is a major open problem in Fair Division, and there are only positive results for special cases. [George Christodoulou, Amos Fiat, Elias Koutsoupias, Alkmini Sgouritsa 2023] introduced a restriction on the agents' valuations according to a graph structure: the vertices correspond to agents and the edges to goods, and each vertex/agent has zero marginal value (or in other words, they are indifferent) for the edges/goods that are not adjacent to them. The existence of EFX allocations has been shown for simple graphs with general monotone valuations [George Christodoulou, Amos Fiat, Elias Koutsoupias, Alkmini Sgouritsa 2023], and for multigraphs for restricted additive valuations [Alireza Kaviani, Masoud Seddighin, Amir Mohammad Shahrezaei 2024]. In this work, we push the state-of-the-art further, and show that the EFX allocations always exists in multigraphs and general monotone valuations if any of the following three conditions hold: either (a) the multigraph is bipartite, or (b) each agent has at most lceil fracn4 rceil -1 neighbors, where n is the total number of agents, or (c) the shortest cycle with non-parallel edges has length at least 6.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2025.

Builds on

21 of 39 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuationscited by 22
  2. 2022Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: Recent Progress and Open Questionscited by 21
  3. 2020EFX Exists for Three Agentscited by 14
  4. 2020Maximum Nash Welfare and Other Stories About EFXcited by 13
  5. 2020Fair and Truthful Mechanisms for Dichotomous Valuationscited by 13
  6. 2019A Little Charity Guarantees Almost Envy-Freenesscited by 12
  7. 2019Envy-freeness up to any item with high Nash welfare: The virtue of donating itemscited by 10
  8. 2019Multiple Birds with One Stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via Envy Cycle Eliminationcited by 8
  9. 2021Improving EFX Guarantees through Rainbow Cycle Numbercited by 6
  10. 2015A Discrete and Bounded Envy-free Cake Cutting Protocol for Four Agentscited by 4
  11. 2020Fair and Efficient Allocations under Lexicographic Preferencescited by 4
  12. 2024Pushing the Frontier on Approximate EFX Allocationscited by 4
9 more
  1. 2021Extension of Additive Valuations to General Valuations on the Existence of EFXcited by 3
  2. 2022Rainbow Cycle Number and EFX Allocations: (Almost) Closing the Gapcited by 3
  3. 2023Improved EFX Approximation Guarantees under Ordinal-based Assumptionscited by 3
  4. 2024On The Pursuit of EFX for Chores: Non-Existence and Approximationscited by 3
  5. 2024Almost Envy-free Allocation of Indivisible Goods: A Tale of Two Valuationscited by 2
  6. 2024A Complete Landscape of EFX Allocations on Graphs: Goods, Chores and Mixed Mannacited by 2
  7. 2024EFX Orientations of Multigraphscited by 2
  8. 2024EFX Allocations on Some Multi-graph Classescited by 2
  9. 2023The Frontier of Intractability for EFX with Two Agentscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.