Improving EFX Guarantees through Rainbow Cycle Number
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among n agents with additive valuations. Envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) is arguably the most compelling fairness notion in this context. However, the existence of EFX allocations has not been settled and is one of the most important problems in fair division. Towards resolving this problem, many impressive results show the existence of its relaxations, e.g., the existence of 0.618-EFX allocations, and the existence of EFX at most n-1 unallocated goods. The latter result was recently improved for three agents, in which the two unallocated goods are allocated through an involved procedure. Reducing the number of unallocated goods for arbitrary number of agents is a systematic way to settle the big question. In this paper, we develop a new approach, and show that for every varepsilon ∈ (0,1/2], there always exists a (1-varepsilon)-EFX allocation with sublinear number of unallocated goods and high Nash welfare. For this, we reduce the EFX problem to a novel problem in extremal graph theory. We introduce the notion of rainbow cycle number R(·). For all d ∈ mathbbN, R(d) is the largest k such that there exists a k-partite digraph G =(cupi ∈ [k] Vi, E), in which 1) each part has at most d vertices, i.e., lvert Vi rvert ≤ d for all i ∈ [k], 2) for any two parts Vi and Vj, each vertex in Vi has an incoming edge from some vertex in Vj and vice-versa, and 3) there exists no cycle in G that contains at most one vertex from each part. We show that any upper bound on R(d) directly translates to a sublinear bound on the number of unallocated goods. We establish a polynomial upper bound on R(d), yielding our main result. Furthermore, our approach is constructive, which also gives a polynomial-time algorithm for finding such an allocation.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Pushing the Frontier on Approximate EFX Allocationscited by 4
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairnesscited by 3
- 2025On the existence of EFX allocations in multigraphscited by 1
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Divisioncited by 0
- 2026Maximin Share Guarantees via Limited Cost-Sensitive Sharingcited by 0
- 2026EFX Allocation In (Multi)Hypergraphscited by 0
- 2026EFX Allocation In (Multi)Hypergraphs4 Aug 2026
- 2026Maximin Share Guarantees via Limited Cost-Sensitive Sharing24 Feb 2026
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Division20 Jul 2025
- 2025On the existence of EFX allocations in multigraphs13 Feb 2025
- 2024Pushing the Frontier on Approximate EFX Allocations18 Jun 2024
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairness17 Sep 2021