On The Pursuit of EFX for Chores: Non-Existence and Approximations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of chores to a group of agents. The existence of envy-free up to any item (EFX) allocations is a long-standing open question for both goods and chores. We resolve this question by providing a negative answer for the latter, presenting a simple construction that admits no EFX solutions for allocating six items to three agents equipped with superadditive cost functions, thus proving a separation result between goods and bads. In fact, we uncover a deeper insight, showing that the instance has unbounded approximation ratio. Moreover, we show that deciding whether an EFX allocation exists is NP-complete. On the positive side, we establish the existence of EFX allocations under general monotone cost functions when the number of items is at most n+2. We then shift our attention to additive cost functions. We employ a general framework in order to improve the approximation guarantees in the well-studied case of three additive agents, and provide several conditional approximation bounds that leverage ordinal information.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Division20 Jul 2025
- 2025On the existence of EFX allocations in multigraphs13 Feb 2025
- 2024Pushing the Frontier on Approximate EFX Allocations18 Jun 2024