Envy-freeness up to any item with high Nash welfare: The virtue of donating items
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Several fairness concepts have been proposed recently in attempts to approximate envy-freeness in settings with indivisible goods. Among them, the concept of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is arguably the closest to envy-freeness. Unfortunately, EFX allocations are not known to exist except in a few special cases. We make significant progress in this direction. We show that for every instance with additive valuations, there is an EFX allocation of a subset of items with a Nash welfare that is at least half of the maximum possible Nash welfare for the original set of items. That is, after donating some items to a charity, one can distribute the remaining items in a fair way with high efficiency. This bound is proved to be best possible. Our proof is constructive and highlights the importance of maximum Nash welfare allocation. Starting with such an allocation, our algorithm decides which items to donate and redistributes the initial bundles to the agents, eventually obtaining an allocation with the claimed efficiency guarantee. The application of our algorithm to large markets, where the valuations of an agent for every item is relatively small, yields EFX with almost optimal Nash welfare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first use of large market assumptions in the fair division literature. We also show that our algorithm can be modified to compute, in polynomial-time, EFX allocations that approximate optimal Nash welfare within a factor of at most 2ρ, using a ρ-approximate allocation on input instead of the maximum Nash welfare one.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2024Pushing the Frontier on Approximate EFX Allocationscited by 4
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairnesscited by 3
- 2023EFX Allocations Exist for Binary Valuationscited by 3
- 2025Understanding EFX Allocations: Counting and Variantscited by 3
- 2025On the existence of EFX allocations in multigraphscited by 1
- 2025Multilevel Fair Allocation with Matroid-Rank Preferencescited by 1
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Divisioncited by 0
- 2026Maximin Share Guarantees via Limited Cost-Sensitive Sharingcited by 0
- 2026Online Fair Division with Budget Constraintscited by 0
- 2026EFX Allocation In (Multi)Hypergraphscited by 0
- 2026EFX Allocation In (Multi)Hypergraphs4 Aug 2026
- 2026Online Fair Division with Budget Constraints25 Jul 2026
- 2026Maximin Share Guarantees via Limited Cost-Sensitive Sharing24 Feb 2026
- 2025Multilevel Fair Allocation with Matroid-Rank Preferences30 Dec 2025
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Division20 Jul 2025
- 2025Understanding EFX Allocations: Counting and Variants4 Apr 2025
- 2025On the existence of EFX allocations in multigraphs13 Feb 2025
- 2024Pushing the Frontier on Approximate EFX Allocations18 Jun 2024
- 2023EFX Allocations Exist for Binary Valuations10 Aug 2023
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairness17 Sep 2021