eXplaining to Learn (eX2L): Regularization Using Contrastive Visual Explanation Pairs for Distribution Shifts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite extensive research into mitigating distribution shifts, many existing algorithms yield inconsistent performance, often failing to outperform baseline Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) across diverse scenarios and necessitating newer algorithms which can handle scenarios where existing algorithms currently underperform. Furthermore, high algorithmic complexity frequently limits interpretability and offers only an indirect means of addressing spurious correlations. We propose eXplaining to Learn (eX2L): an interpretable, explanation-based framework that decorrelates confounding features from a classifier's latent representations during training. eX2L achieves this by penalizing the similarity between Grad-CAM activation maps generated by a primary label classifier and those from a concurrently trained confounder classifier. On the rigorous Spawrious Many-to-Many Hard Challenge synthetic data benchmark, eX2L achieves an average accuracy (AA) of 82.24% +/- 3.87% and a worst-group accuracy (WGA) of 66.31% +/- 8.73%, outperforming the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) by 5.49% and 10.90%, respectively. Beyond its competitive performance, eX2L demonstrates that functional domain invariance can be enforced by explicitly decoupling label and nuisance attributes at the group level.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 39 references.
References · 26
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
14 more
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
- 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 119
- 2021Towards a Theoretical Framework of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 94
- 2021On the Impact of Spurious Correlation for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 68
- 2023Spawrious: A Benchmark for Fine Control of Spurious Correlation Biasescited by 41
- 2021Influence Tuning: Demoting Spurious Correlations via Instance Attribution and Instance-Driven Updatescited by 27
- 2022Back-to-Bones: Rediscovering the Role of Backbones in Domain Generalizationcited by 12
- 2022Identifying Spurious Correlations and Correcting them with an Explanation-based Learningcited by 10
- 2025Shortcut Learning Susceptibility in Vision Classifierscited by 4
- 2023Detecting Spurious Correlations via Robust Visual Concepts in Real and AI-Generated Image Classificationcited by 1
- 2024Boosting Test Performance with Importance Sampling--a Subpopulation Perspectivecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.