Fairness in Agentic AI: A Unified Framework for Ethical and Equitable Multi-Agent System
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring fairness in decentralized multi-agent systems presents significant challenges due to emergent biases, systemic inefficiencies, and conflicting agent incentives. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of fairness in multi-agent AI, introducing a novel framework where fairness is treated as a dynamic, emergent property of agent interactions. The framework integrates fairness constraints, bias mitigation strategies, and incentive mechanisms to align autonomous agent behaviors with societal values while balancing efficiency and robustness. Through empirical validation, we demonstrate that incorporating fairness constraints results in more equitable decision-making. This work bridges the gap between AI ethics and system design, offering a foundation for accountable, transparent, and socially responsible multi-agent AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 2 of its 2 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.
Builds on
2 of 2 references.
References · 2
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directionscited by 27
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Future Directionscited by 46
- 2025A Tutorial on Cognitive Biases in Agentic AI-Driven 6G Autonomous Networkscited by 4
- 2025Toward an Unbiased Collective Memory for Efficient LLM-Based Agentic 6G Cross-Domain Managementcited by 2
- 2025LLM-Based Agentic Negotiation for 6G: Addressing Uncertainty Neglect and Tail-Event Riskcited by 2
- 2026Compliant with Local Controls, Collectively Discriminatory. A Governance Architecture for Multi-Agent AI in Regulated Financecited by 0
- 2026Compliant with Local Controls, Collectively Discriminatory. A Governance Architecture for Multi-Agent AI in Regulated Finance23 Sep 2026
- 2025LLM-Based Agentic Negotiation for 6G: Addressing Uncertainty Neglect and Tail-Event Risk24 Nov 2025
- 2025Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Future Directions29 Oct 2025
- 2025A Tutorial on Cognitive Biases in Agentic AI-Driven 6G Autonomous Networks22 Oct 2025
- 2025Toward an Unbiased Collective Memory for Efficient LLM-Based Agentic 6G Cross-Domain Management30 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FAIRTOPIA: Envisioning Multi-Agent Guardianship for Disrupting Unfair AI Pipelines
- 2026Examining Agents' Bias Amplification versus Suppression in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2025FAIRGAME: a Framework for AI Agents Bias Recognition using Game Theory
- 2024Overcoming the Machine Penalty with Imperfectly Fair AI Agents
- 2026Value-Preserving Architectures for Agentic AI Systems
- 2026Fairness in Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: An SDLC-Oriented Rapid Review
- 2025A Mechanism for Mutual Fairness in Cooperative Games with Replicable Resources -- Extended Version
- 2025From Values to Frameworks: A Qualitative Study of Ethical Reasoning in Agentic AI Practitioners