Examining Agents' Bias Amplification versus Suppression in Multi-Agent Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed to support various tasks where agents interact to achieve individual and collective objectives. Although these systems can enhance task performance and decision-making, fairness preservation through bias reduction remains challenging. This study examines how agent-level biases shift and impact system-wide fairness. We use prompts to expose individual agents to group-favoring bias, then assess downstream impacts at the system level. To quantify the impact, we propose Favor Bias Strength (FBS), a zero-centered metric that decomposes bias alteration between favored-group uplift and disfavored-group suppression. Using multiple agent designs, benchmarks, and up-to-date large language models, we show that agents endowed with bias can substantially affect system-wide fairness. Interestingly, when agents are exposed to bias uniformly, the system-wide bias elevates, even exceeding the additive sum of the individual agents' biases. The empirical evidence underscores the criticality of fairness in multi-agent systems, which warrants further analyses and empirical tests.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 20 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 14
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
- 2018How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairnesscited by 48
- 2024ACC-Collab: An Actor-Critic Approach to Multi-Agent LLM Collaborationcited by 24
- 2025Emergent Bias and Fairness in Multi-Agent Decision Systemscited by 5
- 2025Let's Get You Hired: A Job Seeker's Perspective on Multi-Agent Recruitment Systems for Explaining Hiring Decisionscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Social Cost of Intelligence: Emergence, Propagation, and Amplification of Stereotypical Bias in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Multi-Agent Consensus as a Cognitive Bias Trigger in Human-AI Interaction
- 2025Interactional Fairness in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: An Evaluation Framework
- 2025Fairness in Agentic AI: A Unified Framework for Ethical and Equitable Multi-Agent System
- 2025MALIBU Benchmark: Multi-Agent LLM Implicit Bias Uncovered
- 2025Your AI Bosses Are Still Prejudiced: The Emergence of Stereotypes in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026When Agents Disagree: The Selection Bottleneck in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines
- 2026Beyond Arrow's Impossibility: Fairness as an Emergent Property of Multi-Agent Collaboration