A Mechanism for Mutual Fairness in Cooperative Games with Replicable Resources -- Extended Version
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
The latest developments in AI focus on agentic systems where artificial and human agents cooperate to realize global goals. An example is collaborative learning, which aims to train a global model based on data from individual agents. A major challenge in designing such systems is to guarantee safety and alignment with human values, particularly a fair distribution of rewards upon achieving the global goal. Cooperative game theory offers useful abstractions of cooperating agents via value functions, which assign value to each coalition, and via reward functions. With these, the idea of fair allocation can be formalized by specifying fairness axioms and designing concrete mechanisms. Classical cooperative game theory, exemplified by the Shapley value, does not fully capture scenarios like collaborative learning, as it assumes nonreplicable resources, whereas data and models can be replicated. Infinite replicability requires a generalized notion of fairness, formalized through new axioms and mechanisms. These must address imbalances in reciprocal benefits among participants, which can lead to strategic exploitation and unfair allocations. The main contribution of this paper is a mechanism and a proof that it fulfills the property of mutual fairness, formalized by the Balanced Reciprocity Axiom. It ensures that, for every pair of players, each benefits equally from the participation of the other.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2025.
Builds on
5 of 26 references.
References · 5
- 2022Data Banzhaf: A Robust Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 132
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 100
- 2020Collaborative Machine Learning with Incentive-Aware Model Rewardscited by 71
- 2022Mechanisms that Incentivize Data Sharing in Federated Learningcited by 39
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Altruism and Fair Objective in Mixed-Motive Markov games
- 2026Fairness over Equality: Correcting Social Incentives in Asymmetric Sequential Social Dilemmas
- 2024Learning Fair Cooperation in Mixed-Motive Games with Indirect Reciprocity
- 2026α-fair heterogeneous agent reinforcement learning
- 2024On the Complexity of Learning to Cooperate with Populations of Socially Rational Agents
- 2026Integrated Altruistic and Fairness Preference Induces Advanced Mutual Cooperation in Sequential Social Dilemmas
- 2024Cooperation and Fairness in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Learning to Contest: Decentralized Robust Fairness in Cooperative MARL via Cross-Attention ↗