mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Convergence and Stability of Upside-Down Reinforcement Learning, Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning, and Online Decision Transformers

arXiv 2502.05672 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2025stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

This article provides a rigorous analysis of convergence and stability of Episodic Upside-Down Reinforcement Learning, Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning and Online Decision Transformers. These algorithms performed competitively across various benchmarks, from games to robotic tasks, but their theoretical understanding is limited to specific environmental conditions. This work initiates a theoretical foundation for algorithms that build on the broad paradigm of approaching reinforcement learning through supervised learning or sequence modeling. At the core of this investigation lies the analysis of conditions on the underlying environment, under which the algorithms can identify optimal solutions. We also assess whether emerging solutions remain stable in situations where the environment is subject to tiny levels of noise. Specifically, we study the continuity and asymptotic convergence of command-conditioned policies, values and the goal-reaching objective depending on the transition kernel of the underlying Markov Decision Process. We demonstrate that near-optimal behavior is achieved if the transition kernel is located in a sufficiently small neighborhood of a deterministic kernel. The mentioned quantities are continuous (with respect to a specific topology) at deterministic kernels, both asymptotically and after a finite number of learning cycles. The developed methods allow us to present the first explicit estimates on the convergence and stability of policies and values in terms of the underlying transition kernels. On the theoretical side we introduce a number of new concepts to reinforcement learning, like working in segment spaces, studying continuity in quotient topologies and the application of the fixed-point theory of dynamical systems. The theoretical study is accompanied by a detailed investigation of example environments and numerical experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 7 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2025.

Builds on

7 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning15 Apr

Other references · 6

  1. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
  2. 2019Reinforcement Learning Upside Down: Don't Predict Rewards -- Just Map Them to Actionscited by 124
  3. 2019Training Agents using Upside-Down Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  4. 2021Generalized Decision Transformer for Offline Hindsight Information Matchingcited by 105
  5. 2019Reward-Conditioned Policiescited by 101
  6. 2018ARCHER: Aggressive Rewards to Counter bias in Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices
  2. 2024Goal-Conditioned Decision Transformer for Multi-Goal Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2022On Practical Reinforcement Learning: Provable Robustness, Scalability, and Statistical Efficiency
  4. 2023Goal-conditioned Offline Reinforcement Learning through State Space Partitioning
  5. 2025EXPO: Stable Reinforcement Learning with Expressive Policies
  6. 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2022Regularizing a Model-based Policy Stationary Distribution to Stabilize Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026SCQ: Stabilizing Conservative Q-Learning with Sigmoid-Bounded Entropy