mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Cost-Effective Reward Guided Text Generation

arXiv 2502.04517 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reward-guided text generation (RGTG) has emerged as a viable alternative to offline reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). RGTG methods can align baseline language models to human preferences without further training like in standard RLHF methods. However, they rely on a reward model to score each candidate token generated by the language model at inference, incurring significant test-time overhead. Additionally, the reward model is usually only trained to score full sequences, which can lead to sub-optimal choices for partial sequences. In this work, we present a novel reward model architecture that is trained, using a Bradley-Terry loss, to prefer the optimal expansion of a sequence with just a single call to the reward model at each step of the generation process. That is, a score for all possible candidate tokens is generated simultaneously, leading to efficient inference. We theoretically analyze various RGTG reward models and demonstrate that prior techniques prefer sub-optimal sequences compared to our method during inference. Empirically, our reward model leads to significantly faster inference than other RGTG methods. It requires fewer calls to the reward model and performs competitively compared to previous RGTG and offline RLHF methods.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 39 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

Builds on

39 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation12 Jun
  2. 2023Reward-Augmented Decoding: Efficient Controlled Text Generation With a Unidirectional Reward Model14 Oct
  3. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training2 Jun
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  5. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
  6. 2023Chain of Hindsight Aligns Language Models with Feedback6 Feb
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  8. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback17 Dec
  9. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  10. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
  11. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 28

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  5. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  6. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  10. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  11. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
  12. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
16 more
  1. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
  2. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
  3. 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 231
  4. 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 137
  5. 2023Controlled Decoding from Language Modelscited by 133
  6. 2017Adversarial Learning for Neural Dialogue Generationcited by 103
  7. 2024Probabilistic Inference in Language Models via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlocited by 85
  8. 2022RankGen: Improving Text Generation with Large Ranking Modelscited by 72
  9. 2022NaturalProver: Grounded Mathematical Proof Generation with Language Modelscited by 72
  10. 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalizationcited by 49
  11. 2024Cascade Reward Sampling for Efficient Decoding-Time Alignmentcited by 38
  12. 2023GRACE: Discriminator-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 35
  13. 2021PPL-MCTS: Constrained Textual Generation Through Discriminator-Guided MCTS Decodingcited by 32
  14. 2018Proximal Policy Optimization and its Dynamic Version for Sequence Generationcited by 7
  15. 2018Improving Conditional Sequence Generative Adversarial Networks by Stepwise Evaluationcited by 6
  16. 2023Attribute Controlled Dialogue Promptingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation
  2. 2026CE-RM: A Pointwise Generative Reward Model Optimized via Two-Stage Rollout and Unified Criteria
  3. 2024Sequence to Sequence Reward Modeling: Improving RLHF by Language Feedback
  4. 2024RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution
  5. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization
  6. 2025Reusing Embeddings: Reproducible Reward Model Research in Large Language Model Alignment without GPUs
  7. 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Models
  8. 2025Segmenting Text and Learning Their Rewards for Improved RLHF in Language Model