Beyond Sample-Level Feedback: Using Reference-Level Feedback to Guide Data Synthesis
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Code and instruction data synthesis
Abstract (arXiv)
High-quality instruction-tuning data is crucial for developing Large Language Models (LLMs) that can effectively navigate real-world tasks and follow human instructions. While synthetic data generation offers a scalable approach for creating such datasets, it imposes a quality ceiling where models trained on the data cannot outperform the LLM generating it. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Reference-Level Feedback, a paradigm that extracts desirable characteristics from carefully curated reference samples to guide the synthesis of higher-quality instruction-response pairs. Using this approach, we synthesize REFED, a dataset of 10K instruction-response pairs. Fine-tuning Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Mistral-7B-Instruct on REFED demonstrate state-of-the-art performance among similarly sized models, notably reaching a 43.96% length-controlled win-rate on AlpacaEval 2.0. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Reference-Level Feedback consistently outperforms traditional sample-level feedback methods, generalizes across model architectures, and produces high-quality and diverse data at low cost.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Code and instruction data synthesis, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.
Builds on
18 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
- 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
- 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 254
- 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 230
5 more
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 202
- 2023The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Textcited by 97
- 2023Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generationcited by 96
- 2023Data-Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models with Human Feedback Through Natural Languagecited by 22
- 2023Automatic Evaluation of Generative Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning
- 2023Tuna: Instruction Tuning using Feedback from Large Language Models
- 2023Reflection-Tuning: Data Recycling Improves LLM Instruction-Tuning
- 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
- 2024Self-play with Execution Feedback: Improving Instruction-following Capabilities of Large Language Models
- 2025MAIN: Mutual Alignment Is Necessary for instruction tuning
- 2026GIFT: Guided Fine-Tuning and Transfer for Enhancing Instruction-Tuned Language Models
- 2025RefineCoder: Iterative Improving of Large Language Models via Adaptive Critique Refinement for Code Generation