mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AcquisitionSynthesis: Targeted Data Generation using Acquisition Functions

arXiv 2605.13149 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data quality remains a critical bottleneck in developing capable, competitive models. Researchers have explored many ways to generate top quality samples. Some works rely on rejection sampling: generating lots of synthetic samples and filtering out low-quality samples. Other works rely on larger or closed-source models to extract model weaknesses, necessary skills, or a curriculum off of which to base data generation. These works have one common limitation: there is no quantitative approach to measure the impact of the generated samples on the downstream learner. Active learning literature provides exactly this, in the form of acquisition functions. Acquisition functions measure the informativeness and/or influence of data, providing interpretable, model-centric signals. Inspired by this, we propose AcquisitionSynthesis: using acquisition functions as reward models to train language models to generate higher-quality synthetic data. We conduct experiments on classic verifiable tasks of math, medical question-answering, and coding. Our experimental results indicate that (1) student models trained with AcquisitionSynthesis data achieve good performance on in-distribution tasks (2-7% gain) and is more robust to catastrophic forgetting, and (2) AcquisitionSynthesis models can generate data for other models and for low-to-high resource training paradigms. By leveraging acquisition rewards, we seek to demonstrate a principled path toward model-aware self-improvement that surpasses static datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 44 references.

References · 28

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  5. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
  6. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  7. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  8. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 664
  9. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  10. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
  11. 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 543
  12. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
16 more
  1. 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 417
  2. 2023Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Modelscited by 154
  3. 2025SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 42
  4. 2025Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoningcited by 40
  5. 2024LAB: Large-Scale Alignment for ChatBotscited by 39
  6. 2026Tool-R0: Self-Evolving LLM Agents for Tool-Learning from Zero Datacited by 34
  7. 2024Evaluating Language Models as Synthetic Data Generatorscited by 33
  8. 2024DataEnvGym: Data Generation Agents in Teacher Environments with Student Feedbackcited by 25
  9. 2024Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotationcited by 20
  10. 2024ActiveLLM: Large Language Model-based Active Learning for Textual Few-Shot Scenarioscited by 18
  11. 2021Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreements: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 9
  12. 2025CodeEvo: Interaction-Driven Synthesis of Code-centric Data through Hybrid and Iterative Feedbackcited by 5
  13. 2025Fixing It in Post: A Comparative Study of LLM Post-Training Data Quality and Model Performancecited by 4
  14. 2026Next Generation Active Learning: Mixture of LLMs in the Loopcited by 3
  15. 2025Beyond Sample-Level Feedback: Using Reference-Level Feedback to Guide Data Synthesiscited by 2
  16. 2026Synthetic Data Generation for Training Diversified Commonsense Reasoning Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Active Synthetic Data Generation for Finetuning Language Models
  2. 2025Synthetic Function Demonstrations Improve Generation in Low-Resource Programming Languages
  3. 2025BARE: Leveraging Base Language Models for Few-Shot Synthetic Data Generation
  4. 2024Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration
  5. 2024Balancing Cost and Effectiveness of Synthetic Data Generation Strategies for LLMs
  6. 2024Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspective
  7. 2025Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code
  8. 2026Synthetic Mixed Training: Scaling Parametric Knowledge Acquisition Beyond RAG