Learning from Suboptimal Data in Continuous Control via Auto-Regressive Soft Q-Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) for continuous control often requires large amounts of online interaction data. Value-based RL methods can mitigate this burden by offering relatively high sample efficiency. Some studies further enhance sample efficiency by incorporating offline demonstration data to "kick-start" training, achieving promising results in continuous control. However, they typically compute the Q-function independently for each action dimension, neglecting interdependencies and making it harder to identify optimal actions when learning from suboptimal data, such as non-expert demonstration and online-collected data during the training process. To address these issues, we propose Auto-Regressive Soft Q-learning (ARSQ), a value-based RL algorithm that models Q-values in a coarse-to-fine, auto-regressive manner. First, ARSQ decomposes the continuous action space into discrete spaces in a coarse-to-fine hierarchy, enhancing sample efficiency for fine-grained continuous control tasks. Next, it auto-regressively predicts dimensional action advantages within each decision step, enabling more effective decision-making in continuous control tasks. We evaluate ARSQ on two continuous control benchmarks, RLBench and D4RL, integrating demonstration data into online training. On D4RL, which includes non-expert demonstrations, ARSQ achieves an average 1.62× performance improvement over SOTA value-based baseline. On RLBench, which incorporates expert demonstrations, ARSQ surpasses various baselines, demonstrating its effectiveness in learning from suboptimal online-collected data. Project page is at https://sites.google.com/view/ar-soft-q
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2025.
Builds on
43 of 50 references.
References · 43
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
- 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
31 more
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 685
- 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 669
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 396
- 2021Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 359
- 2023Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datacited by 332
- 2017Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 322
- 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuningcited by 230
- 2021Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Balanced Replay and Pessimistic Q-Ensemblecited by 211
- 2021RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?cited by 184
- 2021Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 150
- 2023Q-Transformer: Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning via Autoregressive Q-Functionscited by 129
- 2023Policy Expansion for Bridging Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 103
- 2017Action Branching Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
- 2022Discriminator-Weighted Offline Imitation Learning from Suboptimal Demonstrationscited by 89
- 2019Discretizing Continuous Action Space for On-Policy Optimizationcited by 65
- 2022MoDem: Accelerating Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 59
- 2017Discrete Sequential Prediction of Continuous Actions for Deep RLcited by 50
- 2023Uni-O4: Unifying Online and Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step On-Policy Optimizationcited by 23
- 2020Learning to Represent Action Values as a Hypergraph on the Action Verticescited by 22
- 2022Solving Continuous Control via Q-learningcited by 21
- 2022On Pathologies in KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning from Expert Demonstrationscited by 18
- 2024Continuous Control with Coarse-to-fine Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2024Bayesian Design Principles for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
- 2024Growing Q-Networks: Solving Continuous Control Tasks with Adaptive Control Resolutioncited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.