mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Brain network science modelling of sparse neural networks enables Transformers and LLMs to perform as fully connected

arXiv 2501.19107 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2025cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dynamic sparse training (DST) can reduce the computational demands in ANNs, but faces difficulties in keeping peak performance at high sparsity levels. The Cannistraci-Hebb training (CHT) is a brain-inspired method for growing connectivity in DST. CHT leverages a gradient-free, topology-driven link regrowth, which has shown ultra-sparse (less than 1% connectivity) advantage across various tasks compared to fully connected networks. Yet, CHT suffers two main drawbacks: (i) its time complexity is O(Nd3) - N node network size, d node degree - restricting it to ultra-sparse regimes. (ii) it selects top link prediction scores, which is inappropriate for the early training epochs, when the network presents unreliable connections. Here, we design the first brain-inspired network model - termed bipartite receptive field (BRF) - to initialize the connectivity of sparse artificial neural networks. We further introduce a GPU-friendly matrix-based approximation of CH link prediction, reducing complexity to O(N3). We introduce the Cannistraci-Hebb training soft rule (CHTs), which adopts a flexible strategy for sampling connections in both link removal and regrowth, balancing the exploration and exploitation of network topology. Additionally, we integrate CHTs with a sigmoid gradual density decay (CHTss). Empirical results show that BRF offers performance advantages over previous network science models. Using 1% of connections, CHTs outperforms fully connected networks in MLP architectures on image classification tasks, compressing some networks to less than 30% of the nodes. Using 5% of the connections, CHTss outperforms fully connected networks in two Transformer-based machine translation tasks. Finally, at 30% connectivity, both CHTs and CHTss outperform other DST methods in language modeling task.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.

Builds on

31 of 63 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  6. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  7. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  8. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  9. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  10. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
  11. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  12. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
19 more
  1. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 495
  2. 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 463
  3. 2017Scalable Training of Artificial Neural Networks with Adaptive Sparse Connectivity inspired by Network Sciencecited by 328
  4. 2016Multi30K: Multilingual English-German Image Descriptionscited by 250
  5. 2024DuQuant: Distributing Outliers via Dual Transformation Makes Stronger Quantized LLMscited by 167
  6. 2022More ConvNets in the 2020s: Scaling up Kernels Beyond 51x51 using Sparsitycited by 142
  7. 2017Deep Rewiring: Training very sparse deep networkscited by 139
  8. 2021Do We Actually Need Dense Over-Parameterization? In-Time Over-Parameterization in Sparse Trainingcited by 110
  9. 2022Monarch: Expressive Structured Matrices for Efficient and Accurate Trainingcited by 106
  10. 2021Sparse Training via Boosting Pruning Plasticity with Neuroregenerationcited by 84
  11. 2021Top-KAST: Top-K Always Sparse Trainingcited by 79
  12. 2021MEST: Accurate and Fast Memory-Economic Sparse Training Framework on the Edgecited by 79
  13. 2021AC/DC: Alternating Compressed/DeCompressed Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 59
  14. 2021Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisationcited by 49
  15. 2023Dynamic Sparse Training with Structured Sparsitycited by 38
  16. 2023SPDF: Sparse Pre-training and Dense Fine-tuning for Large Language Modelscited by 28
  17. 2017Deep Expander Networks: Efficient Deep Networks from Graph Theorycited by 23
  18. 2023Dynamic Sparsity Is Channel-Level Sparsity Learnercited by 18
  19. 2015Common neighbours and the local-community-paradigm for link prediction in bipartite networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.