mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Heterogeneous Connectivity in Sparse Networks: Fan-in Profiles, Gradient Hierarchy, and Topological Equilibria

arXiv 2604.10560 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Profiled Sparse Networks (PSN) replace uniform connectivity with deterministic, heterogeneous fan-in profiles defined by continuous, nonlinear functions, creating neurons with both dense and sparse receptive fields. We benchmark PSN across four classification datasets spanning vision and tabular domains, input dimensions from 54 to 784, and network depths of 2--3 hidden layers. At 90% sparsity, all static profiles, including the uniform random baseline, achieve accuracy within 0.2-0.6% of dense baselines on every dataset, demonstrating that heterogeneous connectivity provides no accuracy advantage when hub placement is arbitrary rather than task-aligned. This result holds across sparsity levels (80-99.9%), profile shapes (eight parametric families, lognormal, and power-law), and fan-in coefficients of variation from 0 to 2.5. Internal gradient analysis reveals that structured profiles create a 2-5x gradient concentration at hub neurons compared to the ~1x uniform distribution in random baselines, with the hierarchy strength predicted by fan-in coefficient of variation (r = 0.93). When PSN fan-in distributions are used to initialise RigL dynamic sparse training, lognormal profiles matched to the equilibrium fan-in distribution consistently outperform standard ERK initialisation, with advantages growing on harder tasks, achieving +0.16% on Fashion-MNIST (p = 0.036, d = 1.07), +0.43% on EMNIST, and +0.49% on Forest Cover. RigL converges to a characteristic fan-in distribution regardless of initialisation. Starting at this equilibrium allows the optimiser to refine weights rather than rearrange topology. Which neurons become hubs matters more than the degree of connectivity variance, i.e., random hub placement provides no advantage, while optimisation-driven placement does.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  5. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  6. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  7. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  8. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  9. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  10. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,546
  11. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
  12. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
11 more
  1. 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 527
  2. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 495
  3. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
  4. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 471
  5. 2020Efficient Content-Based Sparse Attention with Routing Transformerscited by 471
  6. 2017Scalable Training of Artificial Neural Networks with Adaptive Sparse Connectivity inspired by Network Sciencecited by 328
  7. 2014Exploiting Linear Structure Within Convolutional Networks for Efficient Evaluationcited by 306
  8. 2023Dynamic Sparse Training with Structured Sparsitycited by 38
  9. 2025Network Sparsity Unlocks the Scaling Potential of Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  10. 2025Brain network science modelling of sparse neural networks enables Transformers and LLMs to perform as fully connectedcited by 4
  11. 2024Sparser, Better, Deeper, Stronger: Improving Sparse Training with Exact Orthogonal Initializationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.