Single-weight Model Editing for Post-hoc Spurious Correlation Neutralization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural network training tends to exploit the simplest features as shortcuts to greedily minimize training loss. However, some of these features might be spuriously correlated with the target labels, leading to incorrect predictions by the model. Several methods have been proposed to address this issue. Focusing on suppressing the spurious correlations with model training, they not only incur additional training cost, but also have limited practical utility as the model misbehavior due to spurious relations is usually discovered after its deployment. It is also often overlooked that spuriousness is a subjective notion. Hence, the precise questions that must be investigated are; to what degree a feature is spurious, and how we can proportionally distract the model's attention from it for reliable prediction. To this end, we propose a method that enables post-hoc neutralization of spurious feature impact, controllable to an arbitrary degree. We conceptualize spurious features as fictitious sub-classes within the original classes, which can be eliminated by a class removal scheme. We then propose a unique precise class removal technique that makes a single-weight modification, which entails negligible performance compromise for the remaining classes. We perform extensive experiments, demonstrating that by editing just a single weight in a post-hoc manner, our method achieves highly competitive, or better performance against the state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2025.
Builds on
43 of 62 references.
References · 43
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
- 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearningcited by 261
- 2022Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teachercited by 189
31 more
- 2023Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampeningcited by 177
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
- 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 142
- 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 128
- 2020Variational Bayesian Unlearningcited by 114
- 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
- 2022MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training Conflictscited by 81
- 2023Discover and Cure: Concept-aware Mitigation of Spurious Correlationcited by 71
- 2023Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearningcited by 70
- 2020Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisationcited by 69
- 2022Agree to Disagree: Diversity through Disagreement for Better Transferabilitycited by 69
- 2022MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explorecited by 66
- 2023Towards Last-layer Retraining for Group Robustness with Fewer Annotationscited by 54
- 2023Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Multi-modal Models during Fine-tuningcited by 47
- 2023Identifying Spurious Biases Early in Training through the Lens of Simplicity Biascited by 44
- 2023Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlationcited by 39
- 2022Are Vision Transformers Robust to Spurious Correlations?cited by 36
- 2022Avoiding spurious correlations via logit correctioncited by 32
- 2021BARACK: Partially Supervised Group Robustness With Guaranteescited by 25
- 2023Explanation-based Finetuning Makes Models More Robust to Spurious Cuescited by 24
- 2023Spuriosity Didn't Kill the Classifier: Using Invariant Predictions to Harness Spurious Featurescited by 21
- 2024Auto-Train-Once: Controller Network Guided Automatic Network Pruning from Scratchcited by 20
- 2024Decompose-and-Compose: A Compositional Approach to Mitigating Spurious Correlationcited by 18
- 2023RoBoSS: A Robust, Bounded, Sparse, and Smooth Loss Function for Supervised Learningcited by 15
- 2024The Need for Speed: Pruning Transformers with One Recipecited by 15
- 2024Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation Requires Preciser Group Inferencecited by 15
- 2024Learning Robust Classifiers with Self-Guided Spurious Correlation Mitigationcited by 10
- 2024Regulating Model Reliance on Non-Robust Features by Smoothing Input Marginal Densitycited by 10
- 2024ExMap: Leveraging Explainability Heatmaps for Unsupervised Group Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 8
- 2024Improving Robustness to Multiple Spurious Correlations by Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 6
- 2024Learning Generalizable Models via Disentangling Spurious and Enhancing Potential Correlationscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.