mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regulating Model Reliance on Non-Robust Features by Smoothing Input Marginal Density

arXiv 2407.04370 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthy machine learning necessitates meticulous regulation of model reliance on non-robust features. We propose a framework to delineate and regulate such features by attributing model predictions to the input. Within our approach, robust feature attributions exhibit a certain consistency, while non-robust feature attributions are susceptible to fluctuations. This behavior allows identification of correlation between model reliance on non-robust features and smoothness of marginal density of the input samples. Hence, we uniquely regularize the gradients of the marginal density w.r.t. the input features for robustness. We also devise an efficient implementation of our regularization to address the potential numerical instability of the underlying optimization process. Moreover, we analytically reveal that, as opposed to our marginal density smoothing, the prevalent input gradient regularization smoothens conditional or joint density of the input, which can cause limited robustness. Our experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, providing clear evidence of its capability to address the feature leakage problem and mitigate spurious correlations. Extensive results further establish that our technique enables the model to exhibit robustness against perturbations in pixel values, input gradients, and density.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.

Builds on

46 of 70 references.

References · 46

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  9. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  10. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  11. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  12. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
34 more
  1. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  2. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  5. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  6. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  7. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  8. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  9. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  10. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  11. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  12. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  13. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  14. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  15. 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 402
  16. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  17. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  18. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  19. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  20. 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
  21. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
  22. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
  23. 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
  24. 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
  25. 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 141
  26. 2021Transparency of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Interpretability Methodscited by 83
  27. 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
  28. 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
  29. 2021Do Input Gradients Highlight Discriminative Features?cited by 52
  30. 2019Robust Attribution Regularizationcited by 46
  31. 2020Towards Robust Explanations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
  32. 2019A Closer Look at Double Backpropagationcited by 7
  33. 2024A Backdoor-based Explainable AI Benchmark for High Fidelity Evaluation of Attributionscited by 2
  34. 2024Fast-PGM: Fast Probabilistic Graphical Model Learning and Inferencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

10 papers.