mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An XAI-based Analysis of Shortcut Learning in Neural Networks

arXiv 2504.15664 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models tend to learn spurious features - features that strongly correlate with target labels but are not causal. Existing approaches to mitigate models' dependence on spurious features work in some cases, but fail in others. In this paper, we systematically analyze how and where neural networks encode spurious correlations. We introduce the neuron spurious score, an XAI-based diagnostic measure to quantify a neuron's dependence on spurious features. We analyze both convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs) using architecture-specific methods. Our results show that spurious features are partially disentangled, but the degree of disentanglement varies across model architectures. Furthermore, we find that the assumptions behind existing mitigation methods are incomplete. Our results lay the groundwork for the development of novel methods to mitigate spurious correlations and make AI models safer to use in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

24 of 32 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  6. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  7. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  8. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  10. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 657
  11. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  12. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
12 more
  1. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  2. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  3. 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
  4. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
  5. 2020Are Neural Nets Modular? Inspecting Functional Modularity Through Differentiable Weight Maskscited by 97
  6. 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
  7. 2023Simple and Fast Group Robustness by Automatic Feature Reweightingcited by 68
  8. 2021Predict then Interpolate: A Simple Algorithm to Learn Stable Classifierscited by 16
  9. 2022Training Debiased Subnetworks with Contrastive Weight Pruningcited by 16
  10. 2023Is Last Layer Re-Training Truly Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlations?cited by 9
  11. 2024Out of Spuriousity: Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlations without Group Annotationscited by 9
  12. 2025Single-weight Model Editing for Post-hoc Spurious Correlation Neutralizationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.