Multilinguality in LLM-Designed Reward Functions for Restless Bandits: Effects on Task Performance and Fairness
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Restless Multi-Armed Bandits (RMABs) have been successfully applied to resource allocation problems in a variety of settings, including public health. With the rapid development of powerful large language models (LLMs), they are increasingly used to design reward functions to better match human preferences. Recent work has shown that LLMs can be used to tailor automated allocation decisions to community needs using language prompts. However, this has been studied primarily for English prompts and with a focus on task performance only. This can be an issue since grassroots workers, especially in developing countries like India, prefer to work in local languages, some of which are low-resource. Further, given the nature of the problem, biases along population groups unintended by the user are also undesirable. In this work, we study the effects on both task performance and fairness when the DLM algorithm, a recent work on using LLMs to design reward functions for RMABs, is prompted with non-English language commands. Specifically, we run the model on a synthetic environment for various prompts translated into multiple languages. The prompts themselves vary in complexity. Our results show that the LLM-proposed reward functions are significantly better when prompted in English compared to other languages. We also find that the exact phrasing of the prompt impacts task performance. Further, as prompt complexity increases, performance worsens for all languages; however, it is more robust with English prompts than with lower-resource languages. On the fairness side, we find that low-resource languages and more complex prompts are both highly likely to create unfairness along unintended dimensions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 4 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2025.
Builds on
4 of 16 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 3
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 810
- 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 257
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Survey: Multi-Armed Bandits Meet Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Survey: Multi-Armed Bandits Meet Large Language Models19 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026A Component-Based Survey of Interactions between Large Language Models and Multi-Armed Bandits
- 2024Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards
- 2024M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual Settings
- 2025Demystifying Multilingual Chain-of-Thought in Process Reward Modeling
- 2024LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Do
- 2024The Language Barrier: Dissecting Safety Challenges of LLMs in Multilingual Contexts
- 2025mR3: Multilingual Rubric-Agnostic Reward Reasoning Models
- 2026When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Bandits