mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Clustering of Data Sequences with Bandit Information

arXiv 2501.11421 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2025cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of online clustering of data sequences in the multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework under the fixed-confidence setting. There are M arms, each providing i.i.d. samples from a parametric distribution whose parameters are unknown. The M arms form K clusters based on the distance between the true parameters. In the MAB setting, one arm can be sampled at each time. The objective is to estimate the clusters of the arms using as few samples as possible from the arms, subject to an upper bound on the error probability. Our setting allows for: arms within a cluster to have non-identical distributions, vector parameter arms, vector observations, and K ≤ M clusters. We propose and analyze the Average Tracking Bandit Online Clustering (ATBOC) algorithm. ATBOC is asymptotically order-optimal for multivariate Gaussian arms, with expected sample complexity grows at most twice as fast as the lower bound as δ rightarrow 0, and this guarantee extends to multivariate sub-Gaussian arms. For single-parameter exponential family arms, ATBOC is asymptotically optimal, matching the lower bound. We also propose a computationally more efficient alternatives Lower and Upper Confidence Bound based Bandit Online Clustering Algorithm (LUCBBOC), and Bandit Online Clustering-Elimination (BOC-ELIM). We derive the computational complexity of the proposed algorithms and compare their per-sample runtime through simulations. LUCBBOC and BOC-ELIM require lower per-sample runtime than ATBOC while achieving comparable performance. All the proposed algorithms are δ-Probably correct, i.e., the error probability of cluster estimate at the stopping time is atmost δ. We validate the asymptotic optimality guarantees through simulations, and present the comparison of our proposed algorithms with other related work through simulations on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2025.

Builds on

17 of 51 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  2. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
  3. 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
  4. 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
  5. 2016An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problemcited by 62
  6. 2021Minimax Optimal Fixed-Budget Best Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 32
  7. 2022Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedbackcited by 15
  8. 2014An Algorithm for Online K-Means Clusteringcited by 12
  9. 2024Active clustering with bandit feedbackcited by 7
  10. 2024A General Framework for Clustering and Distribution Matching with Bandit Feedbackcited by 7
  11. 2019MaxGap Bandit: Adaptive Algorithms for Approximate Rankingcited by 6
  12. 2019Sequential Controlled Sensing for Composite Multihypothesis Testingcited by 5
5 more
  1. 2025Sequential Change Detection for Learning in Piecewise Stationary Bandit Environmentscited by 5
  2. 2018K-medoids Clustering of Data Sequences with Composite Distributionscited by 4
  3. 2016Consensus-ADMM for General Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Programmingcited by 3
  4. 2024Exponentially Consistent Nonparametric Linkage-Based Clustering of Data Sequencescited by 2
  5. 2024Exponentially Consistent Outlier Hypothesis Testing for Continuous Sequencescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.