mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CodEv: An Automated Grading Framework Leveraging Large Language Models for Consistent and Constructive Feedback

arXiv 2501.10421 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2025cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Grading programming assignments is crucial for guiding students to improve their programming skills and coding styles. This study presents an automated grading framework, CodEv, which leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide consistent and constructive feedback. We incorporate Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting techniques to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs and ensure that the grading is aligned with human evaluation. Our framework also integrates LLM ensembles to improve the accuracy and consistency of scores, along with agreement tests to deliver reliable feedback and code review comments. The results demonstrate that the framework can yield grading results comparable to human evaluators, by using smaller LLMs. Evaluation and consistency tests of the LLMs further validate our approach, confirming the reliability of the generated scores and feedback.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2025.

Builds on

10 of 24 references.

References · 10

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  6. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
  7. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
  8. 2024More Agents Is All You Needcited by 180
  9. 2024Towards Greener LLMs: Bringing Energy-Efficiency to the Forefront of LLM Inferencecited by 61
  10. 2023Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Reviewcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025StepGrade: Grading Programming Assignments with Context-Aware LLMs
  2. 2024Grade Like a Human: Rethinking Automated Assessment with Large Language Models
  3. 2025Partnering with AI: A Pedagogical Feedback System for LLM Integration into Programming Education
  4. 2024Unveiling Scoring Processes: Dissecting the Differences between LLMs and Human Graders in Automatic Scoring
  5. 2025Dean of LLM Tutors: A Framework for Automated Quality Review of AI-generated Feedback
  6. 2026A Classroom Study of LLM-Generated Feedback Intervention in Introductory Programming
  7. 2024Investigating Automatic Scoring and Feedback using Large Language Models
  8. 2023Automated Assessment of Students' Code Comprehension using LLMs