mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Partnering with AI: A Pedagogical Feedback System for LLM Integration into Programming Education

arXiv 2507.00406 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2025cs.CYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feedback is one of the most crucial components to facilitate effective learning. With the rise of large language models (LLMs) in recent years, research in programming education has increasingly focused on automated feedback generation to help teachers provide timely support to every student. However, prior studies often overlook key pedagogical principles, such as mastery and progress adaptation, that shape effective feedback strategies. This paper introduces a novel pedagogical framework for LLM-driven feedback generation derived from established feedback models and local insights from secondary school teachers. To evaluate this framework, we implemented a web-based application for Python programming with LLM-based feedback that follows the framework and conducted a mixed-method evaluation with eight secondary-school computer science teachers. Our findings suggest that teachers consider that, when aligned with the framework, LLMs can effectively support students and even outperform human teachers in certain scenarios through instant and precise feedback. However, we also found several limitations, such as its inability to adapt feedback to dynamic classroom contexts. Such a limitation highlights the need to complement LLM-generated feedback with human expertise to ensure effective student learning. This work demonstrates an effective way to use LLMs for feedback while adhering to pedagogical standards and highlights important considerations for future systems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Classroom Study of LLM-Generated Feedback Intervention in Introductory Programming
  2. 2025Towards Adaptive Feedback with AI: Comparing the Feedback Quality of LLMs and Teachers on Experimentation Protocols
  3. 2025Dean of LLM Tutors: A Framework for Automated Quality Review of AI-generated Feedback
  4. 2023Students' Perceptions and Preferences of Generative Artificial Intelligence Feedback for Programming
  5. 2026An Explainable AI Assistant for Introductory Programming Education: Improving Feedback Reliability with Instructor-AI Collaboration
  6. 2025CodEv: An Automated Grading Framework Leveraging Large Language Models for Consistent and Constructive Feedback
  7. 2025Simulating Student-Tutor Interactions with LLMs for Multilingual Math Feedback
  8. 2025A Comparative Study of Student Perspectives on Technical Writing Feedback Quality: Evaluating LLMs, SLMs, and Humans in Computer Science Topics