mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating Automatic Scoring and Feedback using Large Language Models

arXiv 2405.00602 ↗First posted 1 May 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic grading and feedback have been long studied using traditional machine learning and deep learning techniques using language models. With the recent accessibility to high performing large language models (LLMs) like LLaMA-2, there is an opportunity to investigate the use of these LLMs for automatic grading and feedback generation. Despite the increase in performance, LLMs require significant computational resources for fine-tuning and additional specific adjustments to enhance their performance for such tasks. To address these issues, Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as LoRA and QLoRA, have been adopted to decrease memory and computational requirements in model fine-tuning. This paper explores the efficacy of PEFT-based quantized models, employing classification or regression head, to fine-tune LLMs for automatically assigning continuous numerical grades to short answers and essays, as well as generating corresponding feedback. We conducted experiments on both proprietary and open-source datasets for our tasks. The results show that prediction of grade scores via finetuned LLMs are highly accurate, achieving less than 3% error in grade percentage on average. For providing graded feedback fine-tuned 4-bit quantized LLaMA-2 13B models outperform competitive base models and achieve high similarity with subject matter expert feedback in terms of high BLEU and ROUGE scores and qualitatively in terms of feedback. The findings from this study provide important insights into the impacts of the emerging capabilities of using quantization approaches to fine-tune LLMs for various downstream tasks, such as automatic short answer scoring and feedback generation at comparatively lower costs and latency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2024.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  7. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  8. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  9. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  10. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  11. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  12. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
10 more
  1. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  2. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  3. 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
  4. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
  5. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
  6. 2022The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Lawscited by 251
  7. 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 192
  8. 2021Raise a Child in Large Language Model: Towards Effective and Generalizable Fine-tuningcited by 146
  9. 2022Automatic Short Math Answer Grading via In-context Meta-learningcited by 18
  10. 2018Automatic Short Answer Grading and Feedback Using Text Mining Methodscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Fine-tuning for Better Few Shot Prompting: An Empirical Comparison for Short Answer Grading
  2. 2025Analysis of instruction-based LLMs' capabilities to score and judge text-input problems in an academic setting
  3. 2024Enhancing Large Language Model Performance To Answer Questions and Extract Information More Accurately
  4. 2025Language Models are Few-Shot Graders
  5. 2026From Prompting to Preference Optimization: A Comparative Study of LLM-based Automated Essay Scoring
  6. 2024Grade Like a Human: Rethinking Automated Assessment with Large Language Models
  7. 2025Rubric-Conditioned LLM Grading: Alignment, Uncertainty, and Robustness
  8. 2023Towards Better Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models: A Position Paper