mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing the De-identification of Personally Identifiable Information in Educational Data

arXiv 2501.09765 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Protecting Personally Identifiable Information (PII), such as names, is a critical requirement in learning technologies to safeguard student and teacher privacy and maintain trust. Accurate PII detection is an essential step toward anonymizing sensitive information while preserving the utility of educational data. Motivated by recent advancements in artificial intelligence, our study investigates the GPT-4o-mini model as a cost-effective and efficient solution for PII detection tasks. We explore both prompting and fine-tuning approaches and compare GPT-4o-mini's performance against established frameworks, including Microsoft Presidio and Azure AI Language. Our evaluation on two public datasets, CRAPII and TSCC, demonstrates that the fine-tuned GPT-4o-mini model achieves superior performance, with a recall of 0.9589 on CRAPII. Additionally, fine-tuned GPT-4o-mini significantly improves precision scores (a threefold increase) while reducing computational costs to nearly one-tenth of those associated with Azure AI Language. Furthermore, our bias analysis reveals that the fine-tuned GPT-4o-mini model consistently delivers accurate results across diverse cultural backgrounds and genders. The generalizability analysis using the TSCC dataset further highlights its robustness, achieving a recall of 0.9895 with minimal additional training data from TSCC. These results emphasize the potential of fine-tuned GPT-4o-mini as an accurate and cost-effective tool for PII detection in educational data. It offers robust privacy protection while preserving the data's utility for research and pedagogical analysis. Our code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/AnonJD/PrivacyAI

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2025.

Builds on

20 of 43 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 231
  7. 2023From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inferencecited by 168
  8. 2019LAMOL: LAnguage MOdeling for Lifelong Language Learningcited by 156
  9. 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 134
  10. 2021Partial Is Better Than All: Revisiting Fine-tuning Strategy for Few-shot Learningcited by 72
  11. 2014C-sanitized: a privacy model for document redaction and sanitizationcited by 27
  12. 2024Models Are Codes: Towards Measuring Malicious Code Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Model Hubscited by 16
8 more
  1. 2024Can We Count on LLMs? The Fixed-Effect Fallacy and Claims of GPT-4 Capabilitiescited by 13
  2. 2024How Can I Improve? Using GPT to Highlight the Desired and Undesired Parts of Open-ended Responsescited by 10
  3. 2022Behind the Mask: Demographic bias in name detection for PII maskingcited by 7
  4. 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning is All You Need for Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 6
  5. 2024A Study of Optimizations for Fine-tuning Large Language Modelscited by 6
  6. 2022A Comprehensive Study of Gender Bias in Chemical Named Entity Recognition Modelscited by 4
  7. 2022Survey on Privacy-Preserving Techniques for Data Publishingcited by 3
  8. 2022BRATsynthetic: Text De-identification using a Markov Chain Replacement Strategy for Surrogate Personal Identifying Informationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.