mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Agentic Workflow for Detecting Personally Identifiable Information in Crash Narratives

arXiv 2604.15369 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2026cs.CRcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Crash narratives in crash reports provide crucial contextual information for traffic safety analysis. Yet, their broader use is hindered by the presence of personally identifiable information (PII), including names, home addresses, and license plate numbers. Because PII appears sparsely and inconsistently in crash narratives, manual detection is not scalable, and existing rule-based approaches often fail to capture context-dependent PII. This study develops and evaluates a locally deployable, agentic workflow for PII detection in crash narratives by leveraging large language models (LLMs). The workflow contains a Hybrid Extractor and a Verifier. The Hybrid Extractor routes structured PII (e.g., phone numbers and email addresses) to a rule-based model (i.e., Presidio) and context-dependent PII (e.g., names, home addresses, and alphanumeric identifiers) to a domain-adapted, fine-tuned LLM. To address ambiguity in challenging categories, the workflow incorporates ensemble LLM extraction and an agentic verification step that filters false detections through evidence-based reasoning. Evaluated on a real-world crash dataset, the agentic workflow achieves strong performance with a precision of 0.82, a recall of 0.94, an F1 of 0.87, and an accuracy of 0.96, outperforming multiple baseline methods. Moreover, the ablation results suggest that ensemble LLM extraction and Verifier offer improved detection for home addresses and alphanumeric identifiers. The workflow runs locally, supporting privacy-sensitive operational settings where external APIs are restricted. This work offers a practical and robust path for scalable, privacy-preserving crash data processing, enabling broader research and safety interventions while safeguarding individual privacy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  5. 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 160
  6. 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 95
  7. 2023Large Language Models in Analyzing Crash Narratives -- A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, BARD and GPT-4cited by 16
  8. 2024Learning Traffic Crashes as Language: Datasets, Benchmarks, and What-if Causal Analysescited by 10
  9. 2024An Empirical Categorization of Prompting Techniques for Large Language Models: A Practitioner's Guidecited by 7
  10. 2025Enhancing the De-identification of Personally Identifiable Information in Educational Datacited by 7
  11. 2026CrashSight: A Phase-Aware, Infrastructure-Centric Video Benchmark for Traffic Crash Scene Understanding and Reasoningcited by 4
  12. 2021Automated PII Extraction from Social Media for Raising Privacy Awareness: A Deep Transfer Learning Approachcited by 3
2 more
  1. 2025An Agentic AI Workflow for Detecting Cognitive Concerns in Real-world Datacited by 3
  2. 2025Advanced Crash Causation Analysis for Freeway Safety: A Large Language Model Approach to Identifying Key Contributing Factorscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Domain-Adapted Pre-trained Language Models for Implicit Information Extraction in Crash Narratives
  2. 2025CrashSage: A Large Language Model-Centered Framework for Contextual and Interpretable Traffic Crash Analysis
  3. 2025From Narratives to Probabilistic Reasoning: Predicting and Interpreting Drivers' Hazardous Actions in Crashes Using Large Language Model
  4. 2024Leveraging Large Language Models with Chain-of-Thought and Prompt Engineering for Traffic Crash Severity Analysis and Inference
  5. 2026CRASH: Cognitive Reasoning Agent for Safety Hazards in Autonomous Driving
  6. 2025Hierarchical Reasoning with Vision-Language Models for Incident Reports from Dashcam Videos
  7. 2026TransportAgents: a multi-agents LLM framework for traffic accident severity prediction
  8. 2025Advanced Assistance for Traffic Crash Analysis: An AI-Driven Multi-Agent Approach to Pre-Crash Reconstruction