mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Behind the Mask: Demographic bias in name detection for PII masking

arXiv 2205.04505 ↗First posted 9 May 2022cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many datasets contain personally identifiable information, or PII, which poses privacy risks to individuals. PII masking is commonly used to redact personal information such as names, addresses, and phone numbers from text data. Most modern PII masking pipelines involve machine learning algorithms. However, these systems may vary in performance, such that individuals from particular demographic groups bear a higher risk for having their personal information exposed. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of three off-the-shelf PII masking systems on name detection and redaction. We generate data using names and templates from the customer service domain. We find that an open-source RoBERTa-based system shows fewer disparities than the commercial models we test. However, all systems demonstrate significant differences in error rate based on demographics. In particular, the highest error rates occurred for names associated with Black and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2022.

Builds on

11 of 36 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  2. 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 546
  3. 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 282
  4. 2019A Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 199
  5. 2020Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilitiescited by 182
  6. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
  7. 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 125
  8. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  9. 2016De-identification of Patient Notes with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 88
  10. 2021Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metricscited by 83
  11. 2020Assessing Demographic Bias in Named Entity Recognitioncited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

7 papers.