Behind the Mask: Demographic bias in name detection for PII masking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many datasets contain personally identifiable information, or PII, which poses privacy risks to individuals. PII masking is commonly used to redact personal information such as names, addresses, and phone numbers from text data. Most modern PII masking pipelines involve machine learning algorithms. However, these systems may vary in performance, such that individuals from particular demographic groups bear a higher risk for having their personal information exposed. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of three off-the-shelf PII masking systems on name detection and redaction. We generate data using names and templates from the customer service domain. We find that an open-source RoBERTa-based system shows fewer disparities than the commercial models we test. However, all systems demonstrate significant differences in error rate based on demographics. In particular, the highest error rates occurred for names associated with Black and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2022.
Builds on
11 of 36 references.
References · 11
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 546
- 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 282
- 2019A Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 199
- 2020Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilitiescited by 182
- 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
- 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 125
- 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
- 2016De-identification of Patient Notes with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 88
- 2021Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metricscited by 83
- 2020Assessing Demographic Bias in Named Entity Recognitioncited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Security and Privacy Challenges of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 186
- 2023Reducing Privacy Risks in Online Self-Disclosures with Language Modelscited by 47
- 2023Text Sanitization Beyond Specific Domains: Zero-Shot Redaction & Substitution with Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2023In the Name of Fairness: Assessing the Bias in Clinical Record De-identificationcited by 9
- 2025Enhancing the De-identification of Personally Identifiable Information in Educational Datacited by 7
- 2025EchoQA: A Large Collection of Instruction Tuning Data for Echocardiogram Reportscited by 1
- 2025AI-Driven Document Redaction in UK Public Authorities: Implementation Gaps, Regulatory Challenges, and the Human Oversight Imperativecited by 0
- 2025AI-Driven Document Redaction in UK Public Authorities: Implementation Gaps, Regulatory Challenges, and the Human Oversight Imperative2 Dec 2025
- 2025EchoQA: A Large Collection of Instruction Tuning Data for Echocardiogram Reports4 Mar 2025
- 2025Enhancing the De-identification of Personally Identifiable Information in Educational Data14 Jan 2025
- 2024Security and Privacy Challenges of Large Language Models: A Survey30 Jan 2024
- 2023Text Sanitization Beyond Specific Domains: Zero-Shot Redaction & Substitution with Large Language Models16 Nov 2023
- 2023Reducing Privacy Risks in Online Self-Disclosures with Language Models16 Nov 2023
- 2023In the Name of Fairness: Assessing the Bias in Clinical Record De-identification18 May 2023