Comparison of Various SLAM Systems for Mobile Robot in an Indoor Environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This article presents a comparative analysis of a mobile robot trajectories computed by various ROS-based SLAM systems. For this reason we developed a prototype of a mobile robot with common sensors: 2D lidar, a monocular and ZED stereo cameras. Then we conducted experiments in a typical office environment and collected data from all sensors, running all tested SLAM systems based on the acquired dataset. We studied the following SLAM systems: (a) 2D lidar-based: GMapping, Hector SLAM, Cartographer; (b) monocular camera-based: Large Scale Direct monocular SLAM (LSD SLAM), ORB SLAM, Direct Sparse Odometry (DSO); and (c) stereo camera-based: ZEDfu, Real-Time Appearance-Based Mapping (RTAB map), ORB SLAM, Stereo Parallel Tracking and Mapping (S-PTAM). Since all SLAM methods were tested on the same dataset we compared results for different SLAM systems with appropriate metrics, demonstrating encouraging results for lidar-based Cartographer SLAM, Monocular ORB SLAM and Stereo RTAB Map methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2025.
Builds on
7 of 54 references.
References · 7
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
- 2016Direct Sparse Odometrycited by 479
- 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 405
- 2017CNN-SLAM: Real-time dense monocular SLAM with learned depth predictioncited by 152
- 2016Keyframe-based monocular SLAM: design, survey, and future directionscited by 13
- 2017Challenges in Monocular Visual Odometry: Photometric Calibration, Motion Bias and Rolling Shutter Effectcited by 12
- 2024Online Global Loop Closure Detection for Large-Scale Multi-Session Graph-Based SLAMcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.