mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Rich Subjective Quality Information for Image Quality Assessment in the Wild

arXiv 2409.05540 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2024cs.CV cs.MMcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional in the wild image quality assessment (IQA) models are generally trained with the quality labels of mean opinion score (MOS), while missing the rich subjective quality information contained in the quality ratings, for example, the standard deviation of opinion scores (SOS) or even distribution of opinion scores (DOS). In this paper, we propose a novel IQA method named RichIQA to explore the rich subjective rating information beyond MOS to predict image quality in the wild. RichIQA is characterized by two key novel designs: (1) a three-stage image quality prediction network which exploits the powerful feature representation capability of the Convolutional vision Transformer (CvT) and mimics the short-term and long-term memory mechanisms of human brain; (2) a multi-label training strategy in which rich subjective quality information like MOS, SOS and DOS are concurrently used to train the quality prediction network. Powered by these two novel designs, RichIQA is able to predict the image quality in terms of a distribution, from which the mean image quality can be subsequently obtained. Extensive experimental results verify that the three-stage network is tailored to predict rich quality information, while the multi-label training strategy can fully exploit the potentials within subjective quality rating and enhance the prediction performance and generalizability of the network. RichIQA outperforms state-of-the-art competitors on multiple large-scale in the wild IQA databases with rich subjective rating labels. The code of RichIQA will be made publicly available on GitHub.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

Builds on

24 of 72 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 947
  6. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 811
  7. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
  8. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 389
  9. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
  10. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
  11. 2023TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 226
  12. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
12 more
  1. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
  2. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 209
  3. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 166
  4. 2021Blind Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Images via Hierarchical Feature Fusion and Iterative Mixed Database Trainingcited by 71
  5. 2021GraphIQA: Learning Distortion Graph Representations for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 43
  6. 2024Perceptual Video Quality Assessment: A Surveycited by 43
  7. 2021Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 36
  8. 2022Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-Loopcited by 30
  9. 2021Task-Specific Normalization for Continual Learning of Blind Image Quality Modelscited by 18
  10. 2023Perceptual Quality Assessment of Face Video Compression: A Benchmark and An Effective Methodcited by 14
  11. 2022REQA: Coarse-to-fine Assessment of Image Quality to Alleviate the Range Effectcited by 6
  12. 2020User-generated Video Quality Assessment: A Subjective and Objective Studycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: