Fairer LP-based Online Allocation via Analytic Center
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we consider an online resource allocation problem where a decision maker accepts or rejects incoming customer requests irrevocably in order to maximize expected reward given limited resources. At each time, a new order/customer/bid is revealed with a request of some resource(s) and a reward. We consider a stochastic setting where all the orders are i.i.d. sampled from an unknown distribution. Such formulation arises from many classic applications such as the canonical (quantity-based) network revenue management problem and the Adwords problem. While the literature on the topic mainly focuses on regret minimization, our paper considers the textitfairness aspect of the problem. On a high level, we define the fairness in a way that a fair online algorithm should treat similar agents/customers similarly, and the decision made for similar agents/customers should be consistent over time. To achieve this goal, we define the fair offline solution as the analytic center of the offline optimal solution set, and introduce textitcumulative unfairness as the cumulative deviation from the online solutions to the fair offline solution over time. We propose a fair algorithm based on an interior-point LP solver and a mechanism that dynamically detects unfair resource spending. Our algorithm achieves cumulative unfairness on the scale of order O(log(T)), while maintains the regret to be bounded without dependency on T. In addition, compared to the literature, our result is produced under less restrictive assumptions on the degeneracy of the underlying linear program.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2021.
Builds on
25 of 57 references.
References · 25
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
- 2016Fairness in Reinforcement Learningcited by 95
- 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 78
- 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
- 2018Online Learning with an Unknown Fairness Metriccited by 62
- 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 43
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 43
- 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 42
- 2019Equal Opportunity in Online Classification with Partial Feedbackcited by 35
- 2018Individual Fairness in Hindsightcited by 33
13 more
- 2019Online Linear Programming: Dual Convergence, New Algorithms, and Regret Boundscited by 32
- 2015Algorithms with Logarithmic or Sublinear Regret for Constrained Contextual Banditscited by 29
- 2018Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problemscited by 29
- 2021Fair Dynamic Rationingcited by 19
- 2018A Re-solving Heuristic with Uniformly Bounded Loss for Network Revenue Managementcited by 18
- 2013Primal Beats Dual on Online Packing LPs in the Random-Order Modelcited by 17
- 2019Online Allocation and Pricing: Constant Regret via Bellman Inequalitiescited by 16
- 2019Fairness and Utilization in Allocating Resources with Uncertain Demandcited by 16
- 2020Group-level Fairness Maximization in Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 14
- 2019The Bayesian Prophet: A Low-Regret Framework for Online Decision Makingcited by 13
- 2018On preserving non-discrimination when combining expert advicecited by 12
- 2020Sequential Fair Allocation of Limited Resources under Stochastic Demandscited by 4
- 2018Advance Service Reservations with Heterogeneous Customerscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair Divisioncited by 7
- 2023Utility Fairness in Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learningcited by 4
- 2024Keep Everyone Happy: Online Fair Division of Numerous Items with Few Copiescited by 4
- 2022Network Revenue Management with Demand Learning and Fair Resource-Consumption Balancingcited by 3
- 2025Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit Learningcited by 3
- 2025Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit Learning13 Jan 2025
- 2024Keep Everyone Happy: Online Fair Division of Numerous Items with Few Copies23 Aug 2024
- 2024Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair Division1 Jul 2024
- 2023Utility Fairness in Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning28 Nov 2023
- 2022Network Revenue Management with Demand Learning and Fair Resource-Consumption Balancing22 Jul 2022