mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Knowledge Retrieval Based on Generative AI

arXiv 2501.04635 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2025cs.IR cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

This study develops a question-answering system based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) using Chinese Wikipedia and Lawbank as retrieval sources. Using TTQA and TMMLU+ as evaluation datasets, the system employs BGE-M3 for dense vector retrieval to obtain highly relevant search results and BGE-reranker to reorder these results based on query relevance. The most pertinent retrieval outcomes serve as reference knowledge for a Large Language Model (LLM), enhancing its ability to answer questions and establishing a knowledge retrieval system grounded in generative AI. The system's effectiveness is assessed through a two-stage evaluation: automatic and assisted performance evaluations. The automatic evaluation calculates accuracy by comparing the model's auto-generated labels with ground truth answers, measuring performance under standardized conditions without human intervention. The assisted performance evaluation involves 20 finance-related multiple-choice questions answered by 20 participants without financial backgrounds. Initially, participants answer independently. Later, they receive system-generated reference information to assist in answering, examining whether the system improves accuracy when assistance is provided. The main contributions of this research are: (1) Enhanced LLM Capability: By integrating BGE-M3 and BGE-reranker, the system retrieves and reorders highly relevant results, reduces hallucinations, and dynamically accesses authorized or public knowledge sources. (2) Improved Data Privacy: A customized RAG architecture enables local operation of the LLM, eliminating the need to send private data to external servers. This approach enhances data security, reduces reliance on commercial services, lowers operational costs, and mitigates privacy risks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2025.

Builds on

9 of 11 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
  6. 2024The Faiss librarycited by 370
  7. 2023Taiwan LLM: Bridging the Linguistic Divide with a Culturally Aligned Language Modelcited by 29
  8. 2023Advancing the Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Language Models: Towards a Comprehensive Benchmark Suitecited by 13
  9. 2024Breeze-7B Technical Reportcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  2. 2024Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Persian University Knowledge Retrieval
  3. 2024Developing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based LLM Systems from PDFs: An Experience Report
  4. 2025Context-Guided Dynamic Retrieval for Improving Generation Quality in RAG Models
  5. 2025Automatic Dataset Generation for Knowledge Intensive Question Answering Tasks
  6. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions
  7. 2024Deploying Large Language Models With Retrieval Augmented Generation
  8. 2024Generative Information Retrieval Evaluation