mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MSC-Bench: Benchmarking and Analyzing Multi-Sensor Corruption for Driving Perception

arXiv 2501.01037 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-sensor fusion models play a crucial role in autonomous driving perception, particularly in tasks like 3D object detection and HD map construction. These models provide essential and comprehensive static environmental information for autonomous driving systems. While camera-LiDAR fusion methods have shown promising results by integrating data from both modalities, they often depend on complete sensor inputs. This reliance can lead to low robustness and potential failures when sensors are corrupted or missing, raising significant safety concerns. To tackle this challenge, we introduce the Multi-Sensor Corruption Benchmark (MSC-Bench), the first comprehensive benchmark aimed at evaluating the robustness of multi-sensor autonomous driving perception models against various sensor corruptions. Our benchmark includes 16 combinations of corruption types that disrupt both camera and LiDAR inputs, either individually or concurrently. Extensive evaluations of six 3D object detection models and four HD map construction models reveal substantial performance degradation under adverse weather conditions and sensor failures, underscoring critical safety issues. The benchmark toolkit and affiliated code and model checkpoints have been made publicly accessible.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.

Builds on

21 of 25 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 844
  3. 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 464
  4. 2022MapTR: Structured Modeling and Learning for Online Vectorized HD Map Constructioncited by 311
  5. 2022VectorMapNet: End-to-end Vectorized HD Map Learningcited by 243
  6. 2023Robo3D: Towards Robust and Reliable 3D Perception against Corruptionscited by 128
  7. 2022DeepInteraction: 3D Object Detection via Modality Interactioncited by 125
  8. 2021Fog Simulation on Real LiDAR Point Clouds for 3D Object Detection in Adverse Weathercited by 95
  9. 2023SparseFusion: Fusing Multi-Modal Sparse Representations for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detectioncited by 83
  10. 2022LiDAR Snowfall Simulation for Robust 3D Object Detectioncited by 72
  11. 2023Cross Modal Transformer: Towards Fast and Robust 3D Object Detectioncited by 68
  12. 2024IS-Fusion: Instance-Scene Collaborative Fusion for Multimodal 3D Object Detectioncited by 57
9 more
  1. 2024HIMap: HybrId Representation Learning for End-to-end Vectorized HD Map Constructioncited by 48
  2. 20233D Semantic Segmentation in the Wild: Learning Generalized Models for Adverse-Condition Point Cloudscited by 46
  3. 2023RoboBEV: Towards Robust Bird's Eye View Perception under Corruptionscited by 42
  4. 2023Online Vectorized HD Map Construction using Geometrycited by 42
  5. 2023Understanding the Robustness of 3D Object Detection with Bird's-Eye-View Representations in Autonomous Drivingcited by 37
  6. 2024Is Your HD Map Constructor Reliable under Sensor Corruptions?cited by 28
  7. 2024MapDistill: Boosting Efficient Camera-based HD Map Construction via Camera-LiDAR Fusion Model Distillationcited by 26
  8. 2024UniMix: Towards Domain Adaptive and Generalizable LiDAR Semantic Segmentation in Adverse Weathercited by 24
  9. 2024MultiCorrupt: A Multi-Modal Robustness Dataset and Benchmark of LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 11; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: