Assessing the Distributional Fidelity of Synthetic Chest X-rays using the Embedded Characteristic Score
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Chest X-ray (CXR) images are among the most commonly used diagnostic imaging modalities in clinical practice. Stringent privacy constraints often limit the public dissemination of patient CXR images, contributing to the increasing use of synthetic images produced by deep generative models for data sharing and training machine learning models. Given the high-stakes downstream applications of CXR images, it is crucial to evaluate how faithfully synthetic images reflect the underlying target distribution. We propose the embedded characteristic score (ECS), a flexible evaluation procedure that compares synthetic and patient CXR samples through characteristic function transforms of feature embeddings. The choice of embedding can be tailored to the clinical or scientific context of interest. By leveraging the behavior of characteristic functions near the origin, ECS is sensitive to differences in higher moments and distribution tails, aspects that are often overlooked by commonly used evaluation metrics such as the Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID). We establish theoretical properties of ECS and describe a calibration strategy based on a simple resampling procedure. We compare the empirical performance of ECS against FID via simulations and standard benchmark imaging datasets. Assessing synthetic CXR images with ECS uncovers clinically relevant distributional discrepancies relative to patient CXR images. These results highlight the importance of reliable evaluation of synthetic data that inform high-stakes decisions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2025.
Builds on
25 of 69 references.
References · 25
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2016Tutorial on Variational Autoencoderscited by 404
- 2023Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generationcited by 303
13 more
- 2015A note on the evaluation of generative modelscited by 291
- 2015Deep Generative Image Models using a Laplacian Pyramid of Adversarial Networkscited by 214
- 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 199
- 2023Scaling Laws of Synthetic Images for Model Training ... for Nowcited by 107
- 2021Deep Learning for Chest X-ray Analysis: A Surveycited by 84
- 2018An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networkscited by 81
- 2023Toward Verifiable and Reproducible Human Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 66
- 2019HYPE: A Benchmark for Human eYe Perceptual Evaluation of Generative Modelscited by 59
- 2023Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trendcited by 24
- 2024Fr'echet Radiomic Distance (FRD): A Versatile Metric for Comparing Medical Imaging Datasetscited by 19
- 2022medigan: a Python library of pretrained generative models for medical image synthesiscited by 14
- 2023Spiking-Diffusion: Vector Quantized Discrete Diffusion Model with Spiking Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2021DuelGAN: A Duel Between Two Discriminators Stabilizes the GAN Trainingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.