Weber-Fechner Law in Temporal Difference learning derived from Control as Inference
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates a novel nonlinear update rule based on temporal difference (TD) errors in reinforcement learning (RL). The update rule in the standard RL states that the TD error is linearly proportional to the degree of updates, treating all rewards equally without no bias. On the other hand, the recent biological studies revealed that there are nonlinearities in the TD error and the degree of updates, biasing policies optimistic or pessimistic. Such biases in learning due to nonlinearities are expected to be useful and intentionally leftover features in biological learning. Therefore, this research explores a theoretical framework that can leverage the nonlinearity between the degree of the update and TD errors. To this end, we focus on a control as inference framework, since it is known as a generalized formulation encompassing various RL and optimal control methods. In particular, we investigate the uncomputable nonlinear term needed to be approximately excluded in the derivation of the standard RL from control as inference. By analyzing it, Weber-Fechner law (WFL) is found, namely, perception (a.k.a. the degree of updates) in response to stimulus change (a.k.a. TD error) is attenuated by increase in the stimulus intensity (a.k.a. the value function). To numerically reveal the utilities of WFL on RL, we then propose a practical implementation using a reward-punishment framework and modifying the definition of optimality. Analysis of this implementation reveals that two utilities can be expected i) to increase rewards to a certain level early, and ii) to sufficiently suppress punishment. We finally investigate and discuss the expected utilities through simulations and robot experiments. As a result, the proposed RL algorithm with WFL shows the expected utilities that accelerate the reward-maximizing startup and continue to suppress punishments during learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 24 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2024.
Builds on
24 of 51 references.
References · 24
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 687
- 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 571
- 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 482
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 320
- 2023Real-World Humanoid Locomotion with Reinforcement Learningcited by 187
- 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 130
- 2019ROBEL: Robotics Benchmarks for Learning with Low-Cost Robotscited by 72
- 2022L2C2: Locally Lipschitz Continuous Constraint towards Stable and Smooth Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2020Learning Object-conditioned Exploration using Distributed Soft Actor Criticcited by 12
12 more
- 2021Robot Skill Adaptation via Soft Actor-Critic Gaussian Mixture Modelscited by 12
- 2022AdaTerm: Adaptive T-Distribution Estimated Robust Moments for Noise-Robust Stochastic Gradient Optimizationcited by 11
- 2023Provably Robust Temporal Difference Learning for Heavy-Tailed Rewardscited by 9
- 2020Mixing ADAM and SGD: a Combined Optimization Methodcited by 8
- 2021Optimistic Reinforcement Learning by Forward Kullback-Leibler Divergence Optimizationcited by 8
- 2022Consolidated Adaptive T-soft Update for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2022Proximal Policy Optimization with Adaptive Threshold for Symmetric Relative Density Ratiocited by 5
- 2014Logarithmic distributions prove that intrinsic learning is Hebbiancited by 4
- 2021Canonical Cortical Circuits and the Duality of Bayesian Inference and Optimal Controlcited by 2
- 2022Randomized-to-Canonical Model Predictive Control for Real-world Visual Robotic Manipulationcited by 2
- 2024DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2024Evolving choice hysteresis in reinforcement learning: comparing the adaptive value of positivity bias and gradual perseverationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Deep Reinforcement Learning and The Tale of Two Temporal Difference Errors
- 2024Statistical Inference for Policy Evaluation with Temporal Difference Learning
- 2025Stabilizing Temporal Difference Learning via Implicit Stochastic Recursion
- 2025Implicit Updates for Average-Reward Temporal Difference Learning
- 2026Towards Parameter-Free Temporal Difference Learning
- 2024Mitigating Partial Observability in Sequential Decision Processes via the Lambda Discrepancy
- 2026Stable but Wrong: When Learning Stabilizes Away from the Truth
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Less