mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Partial Observability in Sequential Decision Processes via the Lambda Discrepancy

arXiv 2407.07333 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning algorithms typically rely on the assumption that the environment dynamics and value function can be expressed in terms of a Markovian state representation. However, when state information is only partially observable, how can an agent learn such a state representation, and how can it detect when it has found one? We introduce a metric that can accomplish both objectives, without requiring access to -- or knowledge of -- an underlying, unobservable state space. Our metric, the λ-discrepancy, is the difference between two distinct temporal difference (TD) value estimates, each computed using TD(λ) with a different value of λ. Since TD(λ=0) makes an implicit Markov assumption and TD(λ=1) does not, a discrepancy between these estimates is a potential indicator of a non-Markovian state representation. Indeed, we prove that the λ-discrepancy is exactly zero for all Markov decision processes and almost always non-zero for a broad class of partially observable environments. We also demonstrate empirically that, once detected, minimizing the λ-discrepancy can help with learning a memory function to mitigate the corresponding partial observability. We then train a reinforcement learning agent that simultaneously constructs two recurrent value networks with different λ parameters and minimizes the difference between them as an auxiliary loss. The approach scales to challenging partially observable domains, where the resulting agent frequently performs significantly better (and never performs worse) than a baseline recurrent agent with only a single value network.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.

Builds on

16 of 49 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  3. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  4. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  5. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  6. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  7. 2019Provably efficient RL with Rich Observations via Latent State Decodingcited by 169
  8. 2021Recurrent Model-Free RL Can Be a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPscited by 115
  9. 2022Discovered Policy Optimisationcited by 103
  10. 2022When Is Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning Not Scary?cited by 100
  11. 2015Memory-based control with recurrent neural networkscited by 77
  12. 2023Jumanji: a Diverse Suite of Scalable Reinforcement Learning Environments in JAXcited by 52
4 more
  1. 2021Simple Agent, Complex Environment: Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Agent Statescited by 42
  2. 2021Learning Markov State Abstractions for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
  3. 2013Learning Finite-State Controllers for Partially Observable Environmentscited by 18
  4. 2022Agent-State Construction with Auxiliary Inputscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

7 papers.