Asynchronous Federated Learning: A Scalable Approach for Decentralized Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for decentralized machine learning, enabling collaborative model training across diverse clients without sharing raw data. However, traditional FL approaches often face limitations in scalability and efficiency due to their reliance on synchronous client updates, which can result in significant delays and increased communication overhead, particularly in heterogeneous and dynamic environments. To address these challenges in this paper, we propose an Asynchronous Federated Learning (AFL) algorithm, which allows clients to update the global model independently and asynchronously. Our key contributions include a comprehensive convergence analysis of AFL in the presence of client delays and model staleness. By leveraging martingale difference sequence theory and variance bounds, we ensure robust convergence despite asynchronous updates. Assuming strongly convex local objective functions, we establish bounds on gradient variance under random client sampling and derive a recursion formula quantifying the impact of client delays on convergence. Furthermore, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the AFL algorithm by training decentralized linear regression and Support Vector Machine (SVM) based classifiers and compare its results with synchronous FL algorithm to effectively handling non-IID data distributed among clients. The proposed AFL algorithm addresses key limitations of traditional FL methods, such as inefficiency due to global synchronization and susceptibility to client drift. It enhances scalability, robustness, and efficiency in real-world settings with heterogeneous client populations and dynamic network conditions. Our results underscore the potential of AFL to drive advancements indistributed learning systems, particularly for large-scale, privacy-preserving applications in resource-constrained environments.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.
Builds on
33 of 60 references.
References · 33
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 367
- 2019Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Datacited by 266
- 2021Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 252
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 249
21 more
- 2021Achieving Linear Speedup with Partial Worker Participation in Non-IID Federated Learningcited by 193
- 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
- 2020Minibatch vs Local SGD for Heterogeneous Distributed Learningcited by 147
- 2020Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast Improvementscited by 115
- 2015Why Random Reshuffling Beats Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 79
- 2018Random Shuffling Beats SGD after Finite Epochscited by 67
- 2019How Good is SGD with Random Shuffling?cited by 64
- 2019SGD without Replacement: Sharper Rates for General Smooth Convex Functionscited by 61
- 2020SGD with shuffling: optimal rates without component convexity and large epoch requirementscited by 58
- 2020Closing the convergence gap of SGD without replacementcited by 57
- 2022A Unified Analysis of Federated Learning with Arbitrary Client Participationcited by 45
- 2021Minibatch vs Local SGD with Shuffling: Tight Convergence Bounds and Beyondcited by 36
- 2021Proximal and Federated Random Reshufflingcited by 33
- 2023On the Convergence of Federated Averaging with Cyclic Client Participationcited by 31
- 2023Tighter Lower Bounds for Shuffling SGD: Random Permutations and Beyondcited by 22
- 2021Random Shuffling Beats SGD Only After Many Epochs on Ill-Conditioned Problemscited by 17
- 2024Non-IID data in Federated Learning: A Survey with Taxonomy, Metrics, Methods, Frameworks and Future Directionscited by 13
- 2023A Robust SINDy Approach by Combining Neural Networks and an Integral Formcited by 6
- 2024Queuing dynamics of asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 6
- 2024Climate Aware Deep Neural Networks (CADNN) for Wind Power Simulationcited by 5
- 2024GN-SINDy: Greedy Sampling Neural Network in Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Asynchronous Federated Learning with non-convex client objective functions and heterogeneous datasetcited by 2
- 2025HEART: Achieving Timely Multi-Model Training for Vehicle-Edge-Cloud-Integrated Hierarchical Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026AlignFed: Alignment-Aware Asynchronous Federated Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models in Heterogeneous Edge Environmentscited by 0
- 2026AlignFed: Alignment-Aware Asynchronous Federated Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models in Heterogeneous Edge Environments6 Jun 2026
- 2025Asynchronous Federated Learning with non-convex client objective functions and heterogeneous dataset3 Aug 2025
- 2025HEART: Achieving Timely Multi-Model Training for Vehicle-Edge-Cloud-Integrated Hierarchical Federated Learning17 Jan 2025