GAS: Generative Auto-bidding with Post-training Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Auto-bidding is essential in facilitating online advertising by automatically placing bids on behalf of advertisers. Generative auto-bidding, which generates bids based on an adjustable condition using models like transformers and diffusers, has recently emerged as a new trend due to its potential to learn optimal strategies directly from data and adjust flexibly to preferences. However, generative models suffer from low-quality data leading to a mismatch between the condition, like return to go, and true action value, especially in long sequential decision-making. Besides, the majority preference in the dataset may hinder models' generalization ability on minority advertisers' preferences. While it is possible to collect high-quality data and retrain multiple models for different preferences, the high cost makes it unaffordable, hindering the advancement of auto-bidding into the era of large foundation models. To address this, we propose a flexible and practical Generative Auto-bidding scheme using post-training Search, termed GAS, to refine a base policy model's output and adapt to various preferences. We use weak-to-strong search alignment by training small critics for different preferences and an MCTS-inspired search to refine the model's output. Specifically, a novel voting mechanism with transformer-based critics trained with policy indications could enhance search alignment performance. Additionally, utilizing the search, we provide a fine-tuning method for high-frequency preference scenarios considering computational efficiency. Extensive experiments conducted on the real-world dataset and online A/B test on the Kuaishou advertising platform demonstrate the effectiveness of GAS, achieving significant improvements, e.g., 4.60% increment of target cost.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.
Builds on
22 of 47 references.
References · 22
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2022Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision-Making?cited by 504
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2016Tutorial on Variational Autoencoderscited by 404
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
10 more
- 2017Online Convex Optimization with Stochastic Constraintscited by 94
- 2023Better Training of GFlowNets with Local Credit and Incomplete Trajectoriescited by 83
- 2024Cascade Reward Sampling for Efficient Decoding-Time Alignmentcited by 38
- 2020Softmax Deep Double Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 31
- 2022Sustainable Online Reinforcement Learning for Auto-biddingcited by 28
- 2024AuctionNet: A Novel Benchmark for Decision-Making in Large-Scale Gamescited by 26
- 2021A Cooperative-Competitive Multi-Agent Framework for Auto-bidding in Online Advertisingcited by 22
- 2021Robust Auction Design in the Auto-bidding Worldcited by 21
- 2021Towards Efficient Auctions in an Auto-bidding Worldcited by 19
- 2024Sequential Recommendation for Optimizing Both Immediate Feedback and Long-term Retentioncited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Generative Auto-Bidding in Large-Scale Competitive Auctions via Diffusion Completer-Alignercited by 5
- 2025VAO: Validation-Aligned Optimization for Cross-Task Generative Auto-Biddingcited by 0
- 2026Q-Regularized Generative Auto-Bidding: From Suboptimal Trajectories to Optimal Policiescited by 0
- 2026JD-BP: A Joint-Decision Generative Framework for Auto-Bidding and Pricingcited by 0
- 2026DRIVE: Distributional and Retrieval-Augmented Bidding with Value Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026AIGB-R1: Self-Evolving Generative Auto-Bidding via Hierarchical Planner-Executor Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026AIGB-R1: Self-Evolving Generative Auto-Bidding via Hierarchical Planner-Executor Optimization19 Jul 2026
- 2026DRIVE: Distributional and Retrieval-Augmented Bidding with Value Evaluation12 Jun 2026
- 2026JD-BP: A Joint-Decision Generative Framework for Auto-Bidding and Pricing7 Apr 2026
- 2026Q-Regularized Generative Auto-Bidding: From Suboptimal Trajectories to Optimal Policies6 Jan 2026
- 2025VAO: Validation-Aligned Optimization for Cross-Task Generative Auto-Bidding9 Oct 2025
- 2025Generative Auto-Bidding in Large-Scale Competitive Auctions via Diffusion Completer-Aligner3 Sep 2025