mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Auction Design in the Auto-bidding World

arXiv 2111.02468 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2021cs.GTcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In classic auction theory, reserve prices are known to be effective for improving revenue for the auctioneer against quasi-linear utility maximizing bidders. The introduction of reserve prices, however, usually do not help improve total welfare of the auctioneer and the bidders. In this paper, we focus on value maximizing bidders with return on spend constraints -- a paradigm that has drawn considerable attention recently as more advertisers adopt auto-bidding algorithms in advertising platforms -- and show that the introduction of reserve prices has a novel impact on the market. Namely, by choosing reserve prices appropriately the auctioneer can improve not only the total revenue but also the total welfare. Our results also demonstrate that reserve prices are robust to bidder types, i.e., reserve prices work well for different bidder types, such as value maximizers and utility maximizers, without using bidder type information. We generalize these results for a variety of auction mechanisms such as VCG, GSP, and first-price auctions. Moreover, we show how to combine these results with additive boosts to improve the welfare of the outcomes of the auction further. Finally, we complement our theoretical observations with an empirical study confirming the effectiveness of these ideas using data from online advertising auctions.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamicscited by 20
  2. 2021How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agentscited by 17
  3. 2022Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertiserscited by 17
  4. 2023Multi-channel Autobidding with Budget and ROI Constraintscited by 14
  5. 2024GAS: Generative Auto-bidding with Post-training Searchcited by 6
  6. 2023Online Learning in Contextual Second-Price Pay-Per-Click Auctionscited by 4
  7. 2025Optimal Return-to-Go Guided Decision Transformer for Auto-Bidding in Advertisementcited by 4
  8. 2024AIGB: Generative Auto-bidding via Conditional Diffusion Modelingcited by 2
  9. 2023Online Ad Procurement in Non-stationary Autobidding Worldscited by 1
  10. 2025Enhancing Generative Auto-bidding with Offline Reward Evaluation and Policy Searchcited by 1
  11. 2025Autobidding Arena: unified evaluation of the classical and RL-based autobidding algorithmscited by 1
  12. 2026PRO-Bid: Pareto-Prioritized Regret Optimization for Constraint-Aware Generative Auto-Biddingcited by 1
9 more
  1. 2023RTB Formulation Using Point Processcited by 0
  2. 2025Online Bidding Algorithms with Strict Return on Spend (ROS) Constraintcited by 0
  3. 2025Smart Fast Finish: Preventing Overdelivery via Daily Budget Pacing at DoorDashcited by 0
  4. 2025Auto-bidding under Return-on-Spend Constraints with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 0
  5. 2026Efficiency of Proportional Mechanisms in Online Auto-Bidding Advertisingcited by 0
  6. 2026DRIVE: Distributional and Retrieval-Augmented Bidding with Value Evaluationcited by 0
  7. 2026AIGB-R1: Self-Evolving Generative Auto-Bidding via Hierarchical Planner-Executor Optimizationcited by 0
  8. 2026Beyond Single-Episode Optimization: Sliding-Window Aware Generative Auto-Bidding for Long-Term Advertising Effectivenesscited by 0
  9. 2026Inference Auctionscited by 0