A Parameter-Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection Method on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum machine learning has gained attention for its potential to address computational challenges. However, whether those algorithms can effectively solve practical problems and outperform their classical counterparts, especially on current quantum hardware, remains a critical question. In this work, we propose a novel quantum machine learning method, called Parameter-Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection (PEQAD), for practical image anomaly detection, which aims to achieve both parameter efficiency and superior accuracy compared to classical models. Emulation results indicate that PEQAD demonstrates favourable recognition capabilities compared to classical baselines, achieving an average accuracy of over 90% on benchmarks with significantly fewer trainable parameters. Theoretical analysis confirms that PEQAD has a comparable expressivity to classical counterparts while requiring only a fraction of the parameters. Furthermore, we demonstrate the first implementation of a quantum anomaly detection method for general image datasets on a superconducting quantum processor. Specifically, we achieve an accuracy of over 80% with only 16 parameters on the device, providing initial evidence of PEQAD's practical viability in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era and highlighting its significant reduction in parameter requirements.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.
Builds on
22 of 63 references.
References · 22
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 686
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
- 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 203
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 188
- 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
- 2018Quantum generative adversarial networkscited by 128
- 2019Transfer learning in hybrid classical-quantum neural networkscited by 114
- 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 91
- 2015Evaluating Real-time Anomaly Detection Algorithms - the Numenta Anomaly Benchmarkcited by 88
10 more
- 2021One-Class Classification: A Surveycited by 35
- 2021On Circuit-based Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks for Remote Sensing Imagery Classificationcited by 33
- 2018Learning and Inference on Generative Adversarial Quantum Circuitscited by 22
- 2023Quantum anomaly detection in the latent space of proton collision events at the LHCcited by 21
- 2017Quantum autoencoders via quantum adders with genetic algorithmscited by 19
- 2021A Hierarchy for Replica Quantum Advantagecited by 16
- 2019Generalizing Fingerprint Spoof Detector: Learning a One-Class Classifiercited by 13
- 2018Experimental Implementation of a Quantum Autoencoder via Quantum Adderscited by 12
- 2021Revisiting dequantization and quantum advantage in learning taskscited by 12
- 2023QUILT: Effective Multi-Class Classification on Quantum Computers Using an Ensemble of Diverse Quantum Classifierscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.