mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable quantum-compressed machine learning for complex fluid flows

arXiv 2607.21688 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2026physics.flu-dyn cs.LG quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine-learning surrogates of physical systems face a paradox: explainable models facing the challenge of expressivity to capture complex nonlinear flows, whereas expressive deep surrogates match high-fidelity simulations only through massive parameterisations that turn the learned dynamics into a black box. Here, we introduce quantum-compressed machine learning (QCML), which resolves this tension by compressing the latent propagator of a flow surrogate from 524,288 trainable parameters to no more than 8. This parameter reduction brings the learned dynamical law to the parameter scale of a physical constitutive relation rather than a black-box neural network, making the surrogate directly interpretable and controllable without sacrificing expressivity. The compression is realised by a structured quantum circuit whose unitary propagator constrains the latent spectrum to the unit circle exactly and by construction, replacing exponential error growth with linear accumulation over autoregressive rollouts. Classical regularisation only approximates this constraint: even a quantum-inspired classical baseline penalised towards unitarity collapses within one Lyapunov time on turbulent channel flow, whereas QCML remains stable over the full rollout. Shared phase and coupling angles parameterising the circuit correspond directly to modal frequencies and inter-mode interactions, giving the learned dynamics a physical interpretation in spectral space. On two patient-specific cardiovascular benchmarks, the structured QCML propagator matches the predictive accuracy of its classical counterpart on surface pressure spectra, pressure drop, and wall shear stress. These results establish QCML as a working component of scientific machine learning and a concrete contribution towards practical quantum advantage in real-world prediction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 71 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  3. 2021Restormer: Efficient Transformer for High-Resolution Image Restorationcited by 1,627
  4. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
  5. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
  6. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 385
  7. 2021Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systemscited by 276
  8. 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 203
  9. 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 133
  10. 2016Quantum-enhanced machine learningcited by 79
  11. 2017On Convergence of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition to the Koopman Operatorcited by 73
  12. 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operatorscited by 59
9 more
  1. 2020Universal Approximation Property of Quantum Machine Learning Models in Quantum-Enhanced Feature Spacescited by 44
  2. 2021Learning Dissipative Dynamics in Chaotic Systemscited by 42
  3. 2024Kilometer-Scale Convection Allowing Model Emulation using Generative Diffusion Modelingcited by 32
  4. 2023Plasma Surrogate Modelling using Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 29
  5. 2025Quantum-Informed Machine Learning for Predicting Spatiotemporal Chaos with Practical Quantum Advantagecited by 7
  6. 2026Uni-Flow: a unified autoregressive-diffusion model for complex multiscale flowscited by 4
  7. 2022Development and performance of a HemeLB GPU code for human-scale blood flow simulationcited by 2
  8. 2024A Parameter-Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection Method on a Superconducting Quantum Processorcited by 2
  9. 2026On the Reliability of AI Methods in Drug Discovery: Evaluation of Boltz-2 for Structure and Binding Affinity Predictioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.