A Hierarchy for Replica Quantum Advantage
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We prove that given the ability to make entangled measurements on at most k replicas of an n-qubit state ρ simultaneously, there is a property of ρ which requires at least order 2n measurements to learn. However, the same property only requires one measurement to learn if we can make an entangled measurement over a number of replicas polynomial in k, n. Because the above holds for each positive integer k, we obtain a hierarchy of tasks necessitating progressively more replicas to be performed efficiently. We introduce a powerful proof technique to establish our results, and also use this to provide new bounds for testing the mixedness of a quantum state.
Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2021.
Builds on
3 of 25 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.
16 papers.
Sort:
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 203
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 188
- 2022Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamicscited by 49
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrixcited by 23
- 2022The Complexity of NISQcited by 13
- 2022Foundations for learning from noisy quantum experimentscited by 12
- 2022When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?cited by 12
- 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learningcited by 12
- 2022Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent Measurementscited by 11
- 2022Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurementscited by 8
- 2024On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimationcited by 5
- 2024An optimal tradeoff between entanglement and copy complexity for state tomographycited by 3
4 more
- 2024Learning topological states from randomized measurements using variational tensor network tomographycited by 3
- 2024A Parameter-Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection Method on a Superconducting Quantum Processorcited by 2
- 2025Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled Measurementscited by 1
- 2025Non-iid hypothesis testing: from classical to quantumcited by 0
- 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learning20 Nov 2025
- 2025Non-iid hypothesis testing: from classical to quantum7 Oct 2025
- 2025Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled Measurements8 Jul 2025
- 2024A Parameter-Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection Method on a Superconducting Quantum Processor22 Dec 2024
- 2024On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimation16 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning topological states from randomized measurements using variational tensor network tomography31 May 2024
- 2024An optimal tradeoff between entanglement and copy complexity for state tomography26 Feb 2024
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learning16 Mar 2023
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrix8 Dec 2022
- 2022The Complexity of NISQ13 Oct 2022
- 2022Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurements29 Jul 2022
- 2022When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?10 Jun 2022
4 more
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 203
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 188
- 2022Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamicscited by 49
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrixcited by 23
- 2022The Complexity of NISQcited by 13
- 2022Foundations for learning from noisy quantum experimentscited by 12
- 2022When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?cited by 12
- 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learningcited by 12
- 2022Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent Measurementscited by 11
- 2022Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurementscited by 8
- 2024On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimationcited by 5
- 2024An optimal tradeoff between entanglement and copy complexity for state tomographycited by 3
12 most cited of 16 All 16 (JSON)
- 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learning20 Nov 2025
- 2025Non-iid hypothesis testing: from classical to quantum7 Oct 2025
- 2025Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled Measurements8 Jul 2025
- 2024A Parameter-Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection Method on a Superconducting Quantum Processor22 Dec 2024
- 2024On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimation16 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning topological states from randomized measurements using variational tensor network tomography31 May 2024
- 2024An optimal tradeoff between entanglement and copy complexity for state tomography26 Feb 2024
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learning16 Mar 2023
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrix8 Dec 2022
- 2022The Complexity of NISQ13 Oct 2022
- 2022Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurements29 Jul 2022
- 2022When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?10 Jun 2022
12 newest of 16 All 16 (JSON)