mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RobustFT: Robust Supervised Fine-tuning for Large Language Models under Noisy Response

arXiv 2412.14922 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) plays a crucial role in adapting large language models (LLMs) to specific domains or tasks. However, as demonstrated by empirical experiments, the collected data inevitably contains noise in practical applications, which poses significant challenges to model performance on downstream tasks. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a noise-robust SFT framework to enhance model capabilities in downstream tasks. To address this challenge, we introduce a robust SFT framework (RobustFT) that performs noise detection and relabeling on downstream task data. For noise identification, our approach employs a multi-expert collaborative system with inference-enhanced models to achieve superior noise detection. In the denoising phase, we utilize a context-enhanced strategy, which incorporates the most relevant and confident knowledge followed by careful assessment to generate reliable annotations. Additionally, we introduce an effective data selection mechanism based on response entropy, ensuring only high-quality samples are retained for fine-tuning. Extensive experiments conducted on multiple LLMs across five datasets demonstrate RobustFT's exceptional performance in noisy scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 14; 2026: 10.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deploymentcited by 116
  2. 2025We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systemscited by 27
  3. 2025Panacea: Mitigating Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Post-fine-tuning Perturbationcited by 20
  4. 2025Robustness in Large Language Models: A Survey of Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation Metricscited by 12
  5. 2025CTRAP: Embedding Collapse Trap to Safeguard Large Language Models from Harmful Fine-Tuningcited by 11
  6. 2025Gradient Surgery for Safe LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 11
  7. 2025A Survey on Efficient Large Language Model Training: From Data-centric Perspectivescited by 9
  8. 2026Learning from Mistakes: Negative Reasoning Samples Enhance Out-of-Domain Generalizationcited by 5
  9. 2025Scalable Valuation of Human Feedback through Provably Robust Model Alignmentcited by 4
  10. 2025Forgetting: A New Mechanism Towards Better Large Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 4
  11. 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sinkcited by 4
  12. 2026GNN-as-Judge: Unleashing the Power of LLMs for Graph Learning with GNN Feedbackcited by 4
12 more
  1. 2025Fine-Tuning on Noisy Instructions: Effects on Generalization and Performancecited by 2
  2. 2025ScreenLLM: Stateful Screen Schema for Efficient Action Understanding and Predictioncited by 1
  3. 2026REALM: Reliable Expertise-Aware Language Model Fine-Tuning from Noisy Annotationscited by 1
  4. 2025Weed Out, Then Harvest: Dual Low-Rank Adaptation is an Effective Noisy Label Detector for Noise-Robust Learningcited by 0
  5. 2025MANTRA: a Framework for Multi-stage Adaptive Noise TReAtment During Trainingcited by 0
  6. 2025Self Distillation Fine-Tuning of Protein Language Models Improves Versatility in Protein Designcited by 0
  7. 2026KALE: Enhancing Knowledge Manipulation in Large Language Models via Knowledge-aware Learningcited by 0
  8. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning Needs to Unlock the Potential of Token Prioritycited by 0
  9. 2026Analyzing the Effect of Noise in LLM Fine-tuningcited by 0
  10. 2026Beyond the Golden Teacher: Enhancing Graph Learning through LLM-GNN Co-teachingcited by 0
  11. 2026Positive-Unlabeled Preference Optimization For Chest X-ray Report Generationcited by 0
  12. 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0