Analyzing the Effect of Noise in LLM Fine-tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning is the dominant paradigm for adapting pretrained large language models (LLMs) to downstream NLP tasks. In practice, fine-tuning datasets may contain various forms of noise arising from annotation errors, preprocessing artifacts, or automated data collection. While prior work has focused on designing robust learning algorithms to mitigate performance degradation under noisy conditions, comparatively little is known about how different types of noise affect the internal learning dynamics of LLMs during fine-tuning. In this work, we systematically study the impact of noise on model behavior across three pretrained model families (GPT-2, Qwen2 and Llama-2) and three diverse NLP tasks. We introduce controlled perturbations corresponding to three common real-world noise types: label noise, grammatical noise, and typographical noise. Beyond task-level performance, we analyze layer-wise representation changes and attention patterns to understand how noise propagates through the network. Our results show that corrupting labels (i.e. label noise) consistently causes the largest performance degradation, whereas grammatical noise and typographical noise can occasionally yield mild regularization benefits. We further find that noise effects are localized primarily to task-specific layers, while attention structures remain comparatively stable.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.
Builds on
30 of 42 references.
References · 30
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 512
18 more
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 165
- 2020The Tatoeba Translation Challenge -- Realistic Data Sets for Low Resource and Multilingual MTcited by 127
- 2024Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuningcited by 93
- 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Language Models to Input Perturbationscited by 87
- 2019Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translationcited by 52
- 2021Improved Regularization and Robustness for Fine-tuning in Neural Networkscited by 45
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Artcited by 43
- 2024On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Factscited by 43
- 2022Robust Fine-Tuning of Deep Neural Networks with Hessian-based Generalization Guaranteescited by 34
- 2021Memorisation versus Generalisation in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 32
- 2023It Takes Two to Tango: Navigating Conceptualizations of NLP Tasks and Measurements of Performancecited by 25
- 2023Noise-Robust Fine-Tuning of Pretrained Language Models via External Guidancecited by 24
- 2024RobustFT: Robust Supervised Fine-tuning for Large Language Models under Noisy Responsecited by 24
- 2022Is BERT Robust to Label Noise? A Study on Learning with Noisy Labels in Text Classificationcited by 21
- 2024CleaR: Towards Robust and Generalized Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Noisy Label Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.