Combining Large Language Models with Tutoring System Intelligence: A Case Study in Caregiver Homework Support
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Caregivers (i.e., parents and members of a child's caring community) are underappreciated stakeholders in learning analytics. Although caregiver involvement can enhance student academic outcomes, many obstacles hinder involvement, most notably knowledge gaps with respect to modern school curricula. An emerging topic of interest in learning analytics is hybrid tutoring, which includes instructional and motivational support. Caregivers assert similar roles in homework, yet it is unknown how learning analytics can support them. Our past work with caregivers suggested that conversational support is a promising method of providing caregivers with the guidance needed to effectively support student learning. We developed a system that provides instructional support to caregivers through conversational recommendations generated by a Large Language Model (LLM). Addressing known instructional limitations of LLMs, we use instructional intelligence from tutoring systems while conducting prompt engineering experiments with the open-source Llama 3 LLM. This LLM generated message recommendations for caregivers supporting their child's math practice via chat. Few-shot prompting and combining real-time problem-solving context from tutoring systems with examples of tutoring practices yielded desirable message recommendations. These recommendations were evaluated with ten middle school caregivers, who valued recommendations facilitating content-level support and student metacognition through self-explanation. We contribute insights into how tutoring systems can best be merged with LLMs to support hybrid tutoring settings through conversational assistance, facilitating effective caregiver involvement in tutoring systems.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2024.
Builds on
7 of 49 references.
References · 7
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 188
- 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 126
- 2024AutoTutor meets Large Language Models: A Language Model Tutor with Rich Pedagogy and Guardrailscited by 31
- 2023How to Teach Programming in the AI Era? Using LLMs as a Teachable Agent for Debuggingcited by 30
- 2023Improving Student Learning with Hybrid Human-AI Tutoring: A Three-Study Quasi-Experimental Investigationcited by 8
- 2023Generative Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics: Contextualising Opportunities and Challenges through the Learning Analytics Cyclecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.
11 papers.
- 2025Can Large Language Models Match Tutoring System Adaptivity? A Benchmarking Studycited by 18
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspectivecited by 6
- 2025Problems With Large Language Models for Learner Modelling: Why LLMs Alone Fall Short for Responsible Tutoring in K--12 Educationcited by 2
- 2026Large Language Models as Students Who Think Aloud: Overly Coherent, Verbose, and Confidentcited by 2
- 2026Confirming Correct, Missing the Rest: LLM Tutoring Agents Struggle Where Feedback Matters Mostcited by 2
- 2025The promise and limits of LLMs in constructing proofs and hints for logic problems in intelligent tutoring systemscited by 1
- 2025PAPPL: Personalized AI-Powered Progressive Learning Platformcited by 0
- 2025From Pilots to Practices: A Scoping Review of GenAI-Enabled Personalization in Computer Science Educationcited by 0
- 2026LLM-based Multimodal Feedback Produces Equivalent Learning and Better Student Perceptions than Educator Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026Hybrid LLM-Embedded Dialogue Agents for Learner Reflection: Designing Responsive and Theory-Driven Interactionscited by 0
- 2026Representation Learning to Study Temporal Dynamics in Tutorial Scaffoldingcited by 0
- 2026Confirming Correct, Missing the Rest: LLM Tutoring Agents Struggle Where Feedback Matters Most15 May 2026
- 2026Representation Learning to Study Temporal Dynamics in Tutorial Scaffolding25 Mar 2026
- 2026Hybrid LLM-Embedded Dialogue Agents for Learner Reflection: Designing Responsive and Theory-Driven Interactions24 Feb 2026
- 2026Large Language Models as Students Who Think Aloud: Overly Coherent, Verbose, and Confident1 Feb 2026
- 2026LLM-based Multimodal Feedback Produces Equivalent Learning and Better Student Perceptions than Educator Feedback21 Jan 2026
- 2025Problems With Large Language Models for Learner Modelling: Why LLMs Alone Fall Short for Responsible Tutoring in K--12 Education28 Dec 2025
- 2025From Pilots to Practices: A Scoping Review of GenAI-Enabled Personalization in Computer Science Education23 Dec 2025
- 2025PAPPL: Personalized AI-Powered Progressive Learning Platform18 Aug 2025
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspective30 Jul 2025
- 2025The promise and limits of LLMs in constructing proofs and hints for logic problems in intelligent tutoring systems7 May 2025
- 2025Can Large Language Models Match Tutoring System Adaptivity? A Benchmarking Study7 Apr 2025