A Method for Detecting Legal Article Competition for Korean Criminal Law Using a Case-augmented Mention Graph
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As social systems become increasingly complex, legal articles are also growing more intricate, making it progressively harder for humans to identify any potential competitions among them, particularly when drafting new laws or applying existing laws. Despite this challenge, no method for detecting such competitions has been proposed so far. In this paper, we propose a new legal AI task called Legal Article Competition Detection (LACD), which aims to identify competing articles within a given law. Our novel retrieval method, CAM-Re2, outperforms existing relevant methods, reducing false positives by 20.8% and false negatives by 8.3%, while achieving a 98.2% improvement in precision@5, for the LACD task. We release our codes at https://github.com/asmath472/LACD-public.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2024.
Builds on
26 of 46 references.
References · 26
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
- 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 645
- 2020Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-domain Question Answeringcited by 186
14 more
- 2024TrustAgent: Towards Safe and Trustworthy LLM-based Agentscited by 64
- 2020Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 62
- 2020A Dataset for Statutory Reasoning in Tax Law Entailment and Question Answeringcited by 62
- 2022A Multi-Task Benchmark for Korean Legal Language Understanding and Judgement Predictioncited by 44
- 2024PlanRAG: A Plan-then-Retrieval Augmented Generation for Generative Large Language Models as Decision Makerscited by 42
- 2021A Statutory Article Retrieval Dataset in Frenchcited by 40
- 2021LeSICiN: A Heterogeneous Graph-based Approach for Automatic Legal Statute Identification from Indian Legal Documentscited by 23
- 2021Measuring Law Over Time: A Network Analytical Framework with an Application to Statutes and Regulations in the United States and Germanycited by 17
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrievalcited by 16
- 2023Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative Approachcited by 14
- 2020Complex Societies and the Growth of the Lawcited by 12
- 2020Hier-SPCNet: A Legal Statute Hierarchy-based Heterogeneous Network for Computing Legal Case Document Similaritycited by 10
- 2024Re3val: Reinforced and Reranked Generative Retrievalcited by 9
- 2022Law Article-Enhanced Legal Case Matching: a Causal Learning Approachcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.